Laupland Kevin B, Zygun David A, Davies H Dele, Church Deirdre L, Louie Thomas J, Doig Christopher J
Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary Health Region, Alberta, Canada.
Crit Care Med. 2002 Nov;30(11):2462-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200211000-00010.
Nosocomial bloodstream infections have been extensively investigated, but relatively few studies have specifically evaluated the epidemiology of intensive care unit-acquired bloodstream infections. The study objective was to define the incidence, risk factors, microbiology, and clinical outcomes of intensive care unit-acquired bloodstream infections.
Population-based prospective cohort.
Multidisciplinary intensive care units.
All Calgary Health Region (population 930,000) adult patients admitted to multidisciplinary intensive care units (>/=48 hrs) from May 1, 1999, to April 30, 2000.
Blood sample analysis.
There were 1,158 admission episodes in 1,017 patients; 37% involved females, and mean +/- sd age and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores were 59.6 +/- 18.7 yrs and 23.4 +/- 7.7, respectively. Fifty-one patients developed intensive care unit-acquired bloodstream infections (first positive blood culture >/=48 hrs after intensive care unit admission) for an incidence of 4.4% and an incidence density of 5.2 per 1000 intensive care unit days. Younger age (adjusted odds ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-1.00, p =.01), longer intensive care unit length of stay (adjusted odds ratio, 4.74; 95% CI, 3.26-6.90, p <.001), and lower hematocrit (adjusted odds ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.00, p =.04) were significant independent predictors of intensive care unit-acquired bloodstream infections, and these infections were associated with an increased intensive care unit length of stay of 2.86 days (95% confidence interval, 2.29-3.57, p <.001). Staphylococcus aureus (27%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (14%), and Enterococcus faecium (12%) were most commonly isolated. Four (8%) bloodstream infections involved antibiotic-resistant organisms, and ten (20%) were polymicrobial. In multivariate analysis, intensive care unit-acquired bloodstream infection was associated with an increased intensive care unit mortality rate (adjusted odds ratio, 2.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-4.00, p = 0.04) but not overall hospital mortality rate.
One patient in 20 admitted to Calgary Health Region intensive care units acquires bloodstream infection and suffers longer intensive care unit stay and increased mortality rates. In our region, multiple antibiotic-resistant organisms are uncommon causes of bloodstream infections, suggesting that it may be safe to use narrower spectrum empirical treatment regimens than current guidelines recommend.
医院血流感染已得到广泛研究,但专门评估重症监护病房获得性血流感染流行病学的研究相对较少。本研究的目的是确定重症监护病房获得性血流感染的发病率、危险因素、微生物学特征及临床结局。
基于人群的前瞻性队列研究。
多学科重症监护病房。
1999年5月1日至2000年4月30日期间入住卡尔加里健康区(人口93万)多学科重症监护病房(住院时间≥48小时)的所有成年患者。
血样分析。
1017例患者中有1158次入院;37%为女性,平均年龄±标准差及急性生理与慢性健康状况评分II分别为59.6±18.7岁和23.4±7.7。51例患者发生了重症监护病房获得性血流感染(重症监护病房入院后首次血培养阳性≥48小时),发病率为4.4%,发病密度为每1000个重症监护病房日5.2例。年龄较小(校正比值比,0.98;95%可信区间,0.96 - 1.00,p = 0.01)、重症监护病房住院时间较长(校正比值比,4.74;95%可信区间,3.26 - 6.90,p < 0.001)和血细胞比容较低(校正比值比,0.95;95%可信区间,0.90 - 1.00,p = 0.04)是重症监护病房获得性血流感染的显著独立预测因素,且这些感染与重症监护病房住院时间延长2.86天相关(95%可信区间,2.29 - 3.57,p < 0.001)。最常分离出的病原菌为金黄色葡萄球菌(27%)、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(14%)和粪肠球菌(12%)。4例(8%)血流感染涉及耐药菌,10例(20%)为混合菌感染。多因素分析显示,重症监护病房获得性血流感染与重症监护病房死亡率增加相关(校正比值比,2.03;95%可信区间,1.03 - 4.00,p = 0.04),但与总体医院死亡率无关。
入住卡尔加里健康区重症监护病房的患者中,每20例就有1例发生血流感染,且重症监护病房住院时间延长,死亡率增加。在我们地区,多重耐药菌并非血流感染的常见病因,这表明使用比当前指南推荐范围更窄的经验性治疗方案可能是安全的。