Atwal Anita, Caldwell Kay
Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2002 Dec;16(4):360-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-6712.2002.00101.x.
This paper reports on the evaluation stage of an action research project on interprofessional collaboration in discharge planning. Findings from interviews with health care professionals working in the acute sector had revealed concerns about discharge planning and multidisciplinary teamwork. In the United Kingdom the National Health Service (NHS) Plan has reinforced the need for an integrated approach to health care. Effective health care integration requires effective communication, teamwork and the commitment to deliver integrated care. Integrated documentation is a key strategy for enhancing interprofessional collaboration and reducing the isolation of professionals, and has been successfully implemented in a range of health care settings. Presented with the concerns about the collaborative process in discharge planning, an action research strategy was chosen to bring about change in an orthopaedic ward in one London teaching hospital. This paper will evaluate the implementation of an integrated care pathway with fractured neck of femurs in one London teaching hospital. Care pathways facilitate the management of defined patient groups using interdisciplinary plans of care. The emphasis will be on understanding whether integrated care pathways enhance and develop interprofessional collaboration and enable effective information access and flow across the professions and the organization. The criteria for evaluation, forming the hypotheses of the study, were that interprofessional nonverbal and verbal communication would be enhanced and that interprofesisonal collaboration would increase. Methods of evaluation used were: (i) stakeholder interviews, (ii) interprofessional audit and (iii) analysis of the variances from the integrated care pathway. The evaluation revealed that although integrated care pathways led to improved outcomes for the health care trust there was little evidence to suggest that interprofessional relationships and communication were enhanced. Furthermore, key factors in discharge delays appeared to be organizational rather than professional.
本文报告了一项关于出院计划中跨专业协作的行动研究项目的评估阶段。对急症部门医护人员的访谈结果显示,他们对出院计划和多学科团队合作存在担忧。在英国,《国民健康服务(NHS)计划》强化了对综合医疗保健方法的需求。有效的医疗保健整合需要有效的沟通、团队合作以及提供综合护理的承诺。综合文档是加强跨专业协作和减少专业人员孤立状态的关键策略,并且已在一系列医疗保健环境中成功实施。鉴于对出院计划协作过程的担忧,选择了一种行动研究策略来促使伦敦一家教学医院的骨科病房发生改变。本文将评估伦敦一家教学医院针对股骨颈骨折实施综合护理路径的情况。护理路径通过跨学科护理计划促进对特定患者群体的管理。重点将在于了解综合护理路径是否能加强和发展跨专业协作,并实现跨专业和跨组织的有效信息获取与流通。构成该研究假设的评估标准是,跨专业的非语言和语言沟通将得到加强,跨专业协作将增加。所使用的评估方法包括:(i)利益相关者访谈,(ii)跨专业审计,以及(iii)对综合护理路径差异的分析。评估结果显示,尽管综合护理路径为医疗保健信托带来了更好的结果,但几乎没有证据表明跨专业关系和沟通得到了加强。此外,出院延迟的关键因素似乎在于组织而非专业方面。