Bourgeois Blaise F D
Harvard Medical School, Children's Hospital, Hunnewell 2, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Epilepsy Res. 2002 Nov;52(1):53-60. doi: 10.1016/s0920-1211(02)00185-7.
Although treatment of epilepsy easily evolves into a situation of overtreatment, reversing the process can be difficult and time consuming. Benefits of reducing overtreatment may include a decrease in side effects, better seizure control, a simplification in the medication regimen, improved compliance, and reduced costs. The risks include seizure exacerbation due to withdrawal or due to loss of protection. Reversal of pharmacokinetic interactions may also lead to seizure aggravation or to drug toxicity. When reducing overtreatment, there are three main challenges: to select the drugs that should be eliminated, to choose an appropriate rate of reduction, and to anticipate reversible pharmacokinetic interactions that can have clinically significant consequences. Overall, there is a lack of published data to properly support recommendations for implementing reduction of overtreatment. This is particularly the case in the pediatric population and for the newer antiepileptic drugs.
尽管癫痫治疗很容易演变成过度治疗的情况,但扭转这一过程可能既困难又耗时。减少过度治疗的益处可能包括副作用减少、癫痫发作控制更好、药物治疗方案简化、依从性提高以及成本降低。风险包括因撤药或失去保护作用而导致癫痫发作加剧。药代动力学相互作用的逆转也可能导致癫痫发作加重或药物毒性。在减少过度治疗时,有三个主要挑战:选择应停用的药物、选择合适的减量速率以及预测可能产生具有临床显著后果的可逆药代动力学相互作用。总体而言,缺乏已发表的数据来恰当支持实施减少过度治疗的建议。儿科人群以及新型抗癫痫药物的情况尤其如此。