Logeart Damien, Saudubray Carole, Beyne Pascale, Thabut Gabriel, Ennezat Pierre-Vladimir, Chavelas Christophe, Zanker Caroline, Bouvier Erik, Solal Alain Cohen
Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 100 Boulevard du Gal Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Nov 20;40(10):1794-800. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02482-8.
We compared the accuracy of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) assay with Doppler echocardiography for the diagnosis of decompensated congestive left-heart failure (CHF) in patients with acute dyspnea.
Both BNP and Doppler echocardiography have been described as relevant diagnostic tests for heart failure.
One hundred sixty-three consecutive patients with severe dyspnea underwent BNP assay and Doppler echocardiogram on admission. The accuracy of the two methods for etiologic diagnosis was compared on the basis of the final diagnoses established by physicians who were blinded to the BNP and Doppler findings.
The final etiologic diagnosis was CHF in 115 patients. Twenty-four patients (15%) were misdiagnosed at admission. The BNP concentration was 1,022 +/- 742 pg/ml in the CHF subgroup and 187 +/- 158 pg/ml in the other patients (p < 0.01). A BNP cutoff of 300 pg/ml correctly classified 88% of the patients (odds ratio [OR] 85 [19 to 376], p < 0.0001), but a high negative predictive value (90%) was only obtained when the cutoff was lowered to 80 pg/ml. The etiologic value of BNP was low in patients with values between 80 and 300 pg/ml (OR 1.85 [0.4 to 7.8], p = 0.4) and also in patients who were studied very soon after onset of acute dyspnea. Among the 138 patients with assessable Doppler findings, a "restrictive" mitral inflow pattern had a diagnostic accuracy for CHF of 91% (OR 482 [77 to 3,011], p < 0.0001), regardless of the BNP level.
Bedside BNP measurement and Doppler echocardiography are both useful for establishing the cause of acute dyspnea. However, Doppler analysis of the mitral inflow pattern was more accurate, particularly in patients with intermediate BNP levels or "flash" pulmonary edema.
我们比较了B型利钠肽(BNP)检测与多普勒超声心动图对急性呼吸困难患者失代偿性充血性左心衰竭(CHF)的诊断准确性。
BNP和多普勒超声心动图均已被描述为心力衰竭的相关诊断检查。
163例连续的重度呼吸困难患者入院时接受了BNP检测和多普勒超声心动图检查。基于对BNP和多普勒检查结果不知情的医生所确立的最终诊断,比较了两种方法对病因诊断的准确性。
最终病因诊断为CHF的患者有115例。24例患者(15%)入院时被误诊。CHF亚组的BNP浓度为1,022±742 pg/ml,其他患者为187±158 pg/ml(p<0.01)。BNP临界值为300 pg/ml时,正确分类了88%的患者(比值比[OR]85[19至376],p<0.0001),但只有将临界值降至80 pg/ml时才能获得较高的阴性预测值(90%)。BNP值在80至300 pg/ml之间的患者以及急性呼吸困难发作后很快接受检查的患者中,BNP的病因诊断价值较低(OR 1.85[0.4至7.8],p = 0.4)。在138例可评估多普勒检查结果的患者中,“限制性”二尖瓣血流模式对CHF的诊断准确性为91%(OR 482[77至3,011],p<0.0001),与BNP水平无关。
床旁BNP检测和多普勒超声心动图对确定急性呼吸困难的病因均有用。然而,二尖瓣血流模式的多普勒分析更准确,尤其是在BNP水平中等或“急性”肺水肿的患者中。