Mitral valve prolapse in coronary artery disease.

Mitral valve motion, left ventricular segmental contraction and severity of arterial stenosis were analyzed in 92 patients with coronary artery disease and 28 patients with "atypical chest pain" and normal coronary arterio-rams. Mitral valve motion was evaluated for the presence or absence of leaflet prolapse. Segmental contraction was evaluated by calculating the percent shortening of six chords of the left ventricle measured from right anterior oblique ventriculograms. The severity of disease in each coronary vessel (left anterior descending, left circumflex and right coronary) was graded on a scale of 1 (0 to 30 percent stenosis) to 5 (complete occlusion). Mitral valve prolapse was not suspected clinically but observed angiographically in 15 of 92 patients with coronary artery disease and in 5 of 28 patients with normal coronary arteriograms. In nine patients with coronary artery disease, the prolapse was restricted to the posterior leaflet, in five it was in both the anterior and the posterior leaflets and in one patient in the anterior leaflet only. Mitral regurgitation was noted in seven patients with coronary artery disease; it was mild in six and moderate in one. Among the patients with coronary artery disease, 12 of the 15 (80 percent) with mitral valve prolapse had left ventricular asynergy compared with 63 of the 77 (82 percent) without valve prolapse. The mean scores for severity of disease in the left anterior descending, circumflex and right coronary arteries were, respectively, 4.2, 2.5 and 3.2 in the patients with valve prolapse and 4.2, 2.2 and 3.5 in those without prolapse. In summary, there was no significant correlation between mitral valve prolapse and distribution of coronary arterial obstructions or abnormal patterns of left ventricular segmental contraction. There was a high frequency of mitral valve prolapse in patients with severe coronary artery disease and in those with normal coronary arteriograms and atypical chest pain.