Suppr超能文献

联想对称性与记忆理论。

Associative symmetry and memory theory.

作者信息

Kahana Michael J

机构信息

Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454-9110, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2002 Sep;30(6):823-40. doi: 10.3758/bf03195769.

Abstract

This article reexamines the theory and data concerning two opposing views of episodic association. The independent association hypothesis (IAH) sees associations as unidirectional and separately modifiable links between individual item representations. The associative symmetry hypothesis (ASH) sees an association as a holistic conjunction of the constituent items, blending the elements of their representations into a new one. In early tests of these hypotheses, experimenters compared forward and backward recall of paired associates, looking for asymmetries. Although some studies showed significant differences between forward and backward recall, the vast majority did not. The author of this study used a mathematical analysis of distributed memory models to reexamine this classic question. These analyses revealed that symmetric and asymmetric models can mimic each other, offering identical predictions regarding forward and backward recall. To distinguish these models, the author examined the correlation between forward and backward recall at the level of individual pairs of items. Both this correlation and the correlation between recall of pairs tested in the same direction were near unity. These results provide new evidence favoring the ASH over the IAH.

摘要

本文重新审视了关于情景联想两种对立观点的理论和数据。独立联想假说(IAH)将联想视为个体项目表征之间单向且可分别修改的联系。联想对称假说(ASH)则将联想视为构成项目的整体结合,将其表征元素融合成一个新的表征。在这些假说的早期测试中,实验者比较了配对联想的正向和逆向回忆,寻找不对称性。尽管一些研究显示正向和逆向回忆之间存在显著差异,但绝大多数研究并未发现。本研究的作者使用分布式记忆模型的数学分析来重新审视这个经典问题。这些分析表明,对称模型和不对称模型可以相互模仿,在正向和逆向回忆方面提供相同的预测。为了区分这些模型,作者在个体项目对的层面上检查了正向和逆向回忆之间的相关性。这种相关性以及在相同方向上测试的配对回忆之间的相关性都接近1。这些结果提供了新的证据,支持联想对称假说而非独立联想假说。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验