Kahana Michael J, Caplan Jeremy B
Volen National Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454-0013, USA.
Mem Cognit. 2002 Sep;30(6):841-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03195770.
For pairs of meaningful items (e.g., words), recall accuracy is nearly identical for forward and backward probes. That is, after studying an A-B pair, subjects can recall A given B as well as they can recall B given A (Kahana, 2002). To assess whether this symmetry property is unique to pairs, we investigated the effects of study direction on probed recall of word triples and serial lists. Two experiments revealed a forward-recall advantage in both triples and serial lists. In addition, compound cues produced better recall than did single-item adjacent cues, which, in turn, produced better recall than did remote cues. These findings suggest a discontinuity between the associative processes supporting memory for pairs and those supporting memory for sequences of three or more items.
对于有意义的项目对(例如单词),正向和反向探测的回忆准确率几乎相同。也就是说,在学习A-B对之后,被试者在给定B时回忆A的能力与在给定A时回忆B的能力相当(卡哈纳,2002)。为了评估这种对称特性是否是项目对所特有的,我们研究了学习方向对单词三元组和序列列表探测回忆的影响。两项实验揭示了在三元组和序列列表中都存在正向回忆优势。此外,复合线索比单项相邻线索产生更好的回忆,而单项相邻线索又比远距离线索产生更好的回忆。这些发现表明,支持对项目对记忆的联想过程与支持对三个或更多项目序列记忆的联想过程之间存在不连续性。