Suppr超能文献

有症状的严重颈内动脉狭窄患者的颈动脉内膜切除术

Carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with severe internal carotid artery stenosis.

作者信息

Paciaroni Maurizio, Gallai Virgilio

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, University of Perugia, 06126 Perugia, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Exp Hypertens. 2002 Oct-Nov;24(7-8):623-9. doi: 10.1081/ceh-120015338.

Abstract

Several clinical trials have demonstrated that carotid endarterectomy (CE) in symptomatic patients with 70-99% internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis, when used appropriately in experienced surgical hands (postoperative complications of stroke and death must not exceed 7%) is safe and effective in preventing recurrence of ipsilateral carotid ischemia and, in particular, in preventing disabling ipsilateral stroke. Only five patients need to be treated to prevent one stroke in three years. The time of greatest risk of stroke after the development of symptoms was in the first six months, and the incremental risk decreased out to two years. Instead the risk of stroke with asymptomatic carotid stenosis is low. Forty-five percent of strokes in patients with asymptomatic 60% to 99% stenosis are attributable to lacunes or cardioembolism. Because CE cannot prevent stroke of cardioembolic origin and is less likely to prevent stroke of lacunar origin, it is doubtful that CE can be justified for most patients with asymptomatic arteries.

摘要

多项临床试验表明,对于有症状且颈内动脉(ICA)狭窄70%-99%的患者,在经验丰富的外科医生手中合理实施颈动脉内膜切除术(CE)(术后中风和死亡的并发症不得超过7%),对于预防同侧颈动脉缺血复发,尤其是预防致残性同侧中风是安全有效的。三年中仅需治疗五名患者即可预防一次中风。出现症状后中风风险最高的时间是在前六个月,到两年时额外风险降低。相反,无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者的中风风险较低。无症状性狭窄60%至99%的患者中,45%的中风归因于腔隙性梗死或心源性栓塞。由于CE无法预防心源性栓塞性中风,也不太可能预防腔隙性梗死性中风,因此对于大多数无症状性动脉患者,CE是否合理存在疑问。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验