Barnett H J, Gunton R W, Eliasziw M, Fleming L, Sharpe B, Gates P, Meldrum H
The John P. Robarts Research Institute, Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
JAMA. 2000 Mar 15;283(11):1429-36. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.11.1429.
Therapeutic trials generally have not distinguished outcomes of stroke according to cause.
To determine whether stroke and subsequent disability was of large-artery, lacunar, or cardioembolic origin in patients with different degrees of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis.
Observational study of prospective data collected from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial between 1987 and 1997.
A total of 2885 patients from 106 sites in the United States and abroad (median age, 67 years; 70% male) who had symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis.
Risk of stroke from each of the 3 causes at 5 years by territory and degree of stenosis.
During an average follow-up of 5 years, 749 patients had 1039 strokes, including 112 of cardioembolic, 211 of lacunar, 698 of large-artery, 17 of primary intracerebral hemorrhage, and 1 of subarachnoid hemorrhage origin. The 5-year risk of first stroke after entry into the trial in any territory was 2.6% of cardioembolic cause, 6.9% of lacunar cause, and 19.7% of large-artery cause. The proportion of cardioembolic strokes in the territory of the symptomatic artery was 12.0% and 6.9% in 60% to 69% and 70% to 99% arterial stenosis, respectively; large-artery strokes predominated (78.4%) at 70% to 99% arterial stenosis. With 70% to 99% arterial stenosis, the proportion of strokes of cardioembolic and lacunar origin was 43.5% and 21.6% in asymptomatic and symptomatic arteries, respectively. A total of 67.6% of cardioembolic, 16.7% of lacunar, and 33.0% of large-artery strokes in the territory of the asymptomatic artery were disabling or fatal.
Our data suggest that approximately 20% and 45% of strokes in the territory of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid arteries with 70% to 99% stenosis, respectively, are unrelated to carotid stenosis. The cause of subsequent strokes in similar types of patients should be considered when making treatment decisions involving carotid endarterectomy for patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis, since lacunar and cardioembolic strokes cannot be prevented by endarterectomy.
治疗试验通常未根据病因区分中风的结局。
确定不同程度有症状和无症状颈动脉狭窄患者的中风及随后的残疾是大动脉、腔隙性还是心源性栓塞所致。
对1987年至1997年从北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验收集的前瞻性数据进行观察性研究。
来自美国和国外106个地点的2885名患者(中位年龄67岁;70%为男性),均有症状性颈内动脉狭窄。
按狭窄区域和程度,3种病因导致的5年中风风险。
平均随访5年期间,749名患者发生了1039次中风,包括心源性栓塞性中风112次、腔隙性中风211次、大动脉性中风698次、原发性脑出血性中风17次以及蛛网膜下腔出血性中风1次。进入试验后,任何区域首次中风的5年风险为:心源性栓塞性病因2.6%、腔隙性病因6.9%、大动脉性病因19.7%。在症状性动脉区域,心源性栓塞性中风的比例在动脉狭窄60%至69%和70%至99%时分别为12.0%和6.9%;在动脉狭窄70%至99%时,大动脉性中风占主导(78.4%)。动脉狭窄70%至99%时,无症状和症状性动脉中心源性栓塞性和腔隙性起源中风的比例分别为43.5%和21.6%。无症状动脉区域的心源性栓塞性中风、腔隙性中风和大动脉性中风分别有67.6%、16.7%和33.0%导致残疾或死亡。
我们的数据表明,在动脉狭窄70%至99%的有症状和无症状颈动脉区域,中风分别约有20%和45%与颈动脉狭窄无关。在对无症状颈动脉狭窄患者进行涉及颈动脉内膜切除术的治疗决策时,应考虑类似类型患者随后中风的病因,因为内膜切除术无法预防腔隙性和心源性栓塞性中风。