Estes W K, Maddox W Todd
Department of Psychology, Indiana University Bloomington, 47405, USA.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Nov;28(6):1003-18.
The authors investigated the recognizability of recently studied word and nonword stimuli in relation to both experimentally controlled prior frequency of occurrence and, for words, normative frequency (assessed by counts of occurrences in printed English). The interaction between these variables was small and nonsignificant across all conditions of 2 experiments. Patterns of recognition measures in relation to controlled prior frequency, but not normative frequency, appeared interpretable in terms of response biases generated by long-term priming. Application of a global memory model and analyses of correlations among item categories yielded evidence for a lexicality dimension underlying normative-frequency effects and an implication that "word-frequency effects" on recognition are better termed lexicality effects.
作者研究了最近学习的单词和非单词刺激的可识别性,这与实验控制的先前出现频率有关,对于单词而言,还与规范频率有关(通过印刷英语中的出现次数来评估)。在两个实验的所有条件下,这些变量之间的相互作用都很小且不显著。与受控先前频率而非规范频率相关的识别测量模式,似乎可以根据长期启动产生的反应偏差来解释。应用全局记忆模型并分析项目类别之间的相关性,得出了规范频率效应背后存在词汇性维度的证据,以及一个暗示,即对识别的“单词频率效应”更宜称为词汇性效应。