Suppr超能文献

混合频率词表记忆中词频的参数效应。

Parametric effects of word frequency in memory for mixed frequency lists.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Nov;39(6):1943-6. doi: 10.1037/a0033669. Epub 2013 Jul 8.

Abstract

[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported in Vol 39(6) of Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition (see record 2013-27860-001). In the article there were omissions in Figure 1. All versions of this article have been corrected.] The word frequency paradox refers to the finding that low frequency words are better recognized than high frequency words yet high frequency words are better recalled than low frequency words. Rather than comparing separate groups of low and high frequency words, we sought to quantify the functional relation between word frequency and memory performance across the broad range of frequencies typically used in episodic memory experiments. Here we report that both low frequency and high frequency words are better recalled than midfrequency words. In contrast, we only observe a low frequency advantage when participants were given a subsequent item recognition test. The U-shaped relation between word frequency and recall probability may help to explain inconsistent results in studies using mixed lists with separate groups of high and low frequency words.

摘要

[勘误通知:本文在《实验心理学杂志:学习、记忆与认知》第 39 卷第 6 期(参见记录 2013-27860-001)中报告了一个勘误。文章中的图 1 存在遗漏。本文的所有版本都已更正。]词频悖论是指低频词比高频词更容易被识别,但高频词比低频词更容易被回忆起来的现象。我们没有对低频词和高频词这两个单独的词频组进行比较,而是试图在典型的情景记忆实验的广泛词频范围内量化词频与记忆表现之间的功能关系。在这里,我们报告说低频词和高频词都比中频词更容易被回忆起来。相比之下,当参与者接受随后的项目识别测试时,我们只观察到低频词的优势。词频和回忆概率之间的 U 型关系可能有助于解释使用混合列表和单独的高、低频词组的研究中不一致的结果。

相似文献

1
Parametric effects of word frequency in memory for mixed frequency lists.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Nov;39(6):1943-6. doi: 10.1037/a0033669. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
3
Mechanisms of word concreteness effects in explicit memory: Does context availability play a role?
Mem Cognit. 2019 Jan;47(1):169-181. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0857-x.
4
Exploring word memorability: How well do different word properties explain item free-recall probability?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Apr;28(2):583-595. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01820-w. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
5
How do word frequency and memory task influence directed forgetting: An ERP study.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2019 Dec;146:157-172. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
6
Emotional modulation of episodic memory in school-age children and adults: Emotional items and their associated contextual details.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Sep;149(9):1684-1703. doi: 10.1037/xge0000744. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
7
The shape of things to come: evaluating word frequency as a continuous variable in recognition memory.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Nov;39(6):1947-52. doi: 10.1037/a0033744. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
8
Word imageability influences the emotionality effect in episodic memory.
Cogn Process. 2022 Nov;23(4):655-660. doi: 10.1007/s10339-022-01102-4. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
9
Spatiotemporal pattern of brain electrical activity related to immediate and delayed episodic memory retrieval.
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2020 Nov;175:107309. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2020.107309. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
10
Examining the role of context variability in memory for items and associations.
Mem Cognit. 2018 Aug;46(6):940-954. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0813-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Interresponse times in free recall.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2025 Jul 3. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001498.
2
Bilingual Proficiency Effects on Word Recall and Recognition.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 28;15(4):437. doi: 10.3390/bs15040437.
3
The Penn Electrophysiology of Encoding and Retrieval Study.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2024 Sep;50(9):1421-1443. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001319. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
4
Effects of lexical skills and orthographic neighborhood size in word memory.
Mem Cognit. 2024 Apr;52(3):610-621. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01487-3. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
6
Midbrain-Hippocampus Structural Connectivity Selectively Predicts Motivated Memory Encoding.
J Neurosci. 2022 Dec 14;42(50):9426-9434. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0945-22.2022. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
7
Word frequency effects found in free recall are rather due to Bayesian surprise.
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 25;13:940950. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.940950. eCollection 2022.
9
Word imageability influences the emotionality effect in episodic memory.
Cogn Process. 2022 Nov;23(4):655-660. doi: 10.1007/s10339-022-01102-4. Epub 2022 Jul 20.

本文引用的文献

1
A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory.
Psychon Bull Rev. 1997 Jun;4(2):145-66. doi: 10.3758/BF03209391.
3
Instability in memory phenomena: a common puzzle and a unifying explanation.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Apr;15(2):237-55. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.2.237.
4
The mixed truth about frequency effects on free recall: effects of study list composition.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Oct;14(5):871-6. doi: 10.3758/bf03194114.
6
Word frequency and word likeness mirror effects in episodic recognition memory.
Mem Cognit. 2006 Jun;34(4):826-38. doi: 10.3758/bf03193430.
7
An observation on the role of context variability in free recall.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Sep;31(5):1160-4. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1160.
8
The effect of normative context variability on recognition memory.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Sep;29(5):760-6. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.760.
9
Recognition memory for nouns as a function of abstractness and frequency.
J Exp Psychol. 1961 Jan;61:23-9. doi: 10.1037/h0040561.
10
Learning as a function of word-frequency.
Am J Psychol. 1954 Mar;67(1):138-40.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验