Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Nov;39(6):1943-6. doi: 10.1037/a0033669. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported in Vol 39(6) of Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition (see record 2013-27860-001). In the article there were omissions in Figure 1. All versions of this article have been corrected.] The word frequency paradox refers to the finding that low frequency words are better recognized than high frequency words yet high frequency words are better recalled than low frequency words. Rather than comparing separate groups of low and high frequency words, we sought to quantify the functional relation between word frequency and memory performance across the broad range of frequencies typically used in episodic memory experiments. Here we report that both low frequency and high frequency words are better recalled than midfrequency words. In contrast, we only observe a low frequency advantage when participants were given a subsequent item recognition test. The U-shaped relation between word frequency and recall probability may help to explain inconsistent results in studies using mixed lists with separate groups of high and low frequency words.
[勘误通知:本文在《实验心理学杂志:学习、记忆与认知》第 39 卷第 6 期(参见记录 2013-27860-001)中报告了一个勘误。文章中的图 1 存在遗漏。本文的所有版本都已更正。]词频悖论是指低频词比高频词更容易被识别,但高频词比低频词更容易被回忆起来的现象。我们没有对低频词和高频词这两个单独的词频组进行比较,而是试图在典型的情景记忆实验的广泛词频范围内量化词频与记忆表现之间的功能关系。在这里,我们报告说低频词和高频词都比中频词更容易被回忆起来。相比之下,当参与者接受随后的项目识别测试时,我们只观察到低频词的优势。词频和回忆概率之间的 U 型关系可能有助于解释使用混合列表和单独的高、低频词组的研究中不一致的结果。