Norman Kenneth A
Department of Psychology, University of Colorado at Boulder, USA.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Nov;28(6):1083-94. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.28.6.1083.
Numerous studies have found a null list strength effect (LSE) for recognition sensitivity: Strengthening memory traces associated with some studied items does not impair recognition of nonstrengthened studied items. In Experiment 1, the author found a LSE using receiver operating characteristic-based measures of recognition sensitivity. To account for the discrepancy between this and prior research, the author (a) argues that a LSE occurs for recollection but not for discrimination based on familiarity, and (b) presents self-report data consistent with this hypothesis. Experiment 2 tested the dual-process hypothesis more directly, using switched-plurality (SP) lures to isolate the contribution of recollection. There was a significant LSE for comparisons involving SP lures; the LSE for discrimination of studied items and nominally unrelated lures (which can be supported by familiarity) was not significant.
众多研究发现,在识别敏感性方面存在零列表强度效应(LSE):增强与某些学习项目相关的记忆痕迹不会损害对未增强学习项目的识别。在实验1中,作者使用基于接受者操作特征的识别敏感性测量方法发现了一种LSE。为了解释这一结果与先前研究之间的差异,作者(a)认为LSE发生在回忆过程中,而不是基于熟悉度的辨别过程中,并且(b)呈现了与该假设一致的自我报告数据。实验2更直接地测试了双加工假设,使用切换多数(SP)诱饵来分离回忆的贡献。对于涉及SP诱饵的比较,存在显著的LSE;对于学习项目与名义上无关诱饵(可由熟悉度支持)的辨别,LSE不显著。