• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人在识别和自由回忆中的列表强度效应。

List-strength effects in older adults in recognition and free recall.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 603 E. Daniel St., Champaign, IL, 61820, USA.

Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2019 May;47(4):764-778. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0886-5.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-018-0886-5
PMID:30607754
Abstract

The present investigation provides a novel extension of the retrieving effectively from memory (REM) model to examine free-recall and recognition memory in older adults to inform our understanding of age-related cognitive decline. When some items on a list are strengthened through distributed repetitions, memory for the nonstrengthened items on that list may become impaired depending on how memory is tested-a phenomenon known as the list-strength effect (LSE; e.g., Tulving & Hastie, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92, 297-304, 1972). When the strengthening operation involves distributed repetitions, LSE is robust in free recall, but it is reliably absent in recognition (Malmberg & Shiffrin, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 322-336, 2005; Ratcliff, Clark, & Shiffrin, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 163-178, 1990). Two experiments investigated LSE in recall and recognition in older adults and young adults who encoded items with full or divided attention. Despite showing impaired recall and recognition, older adults showed patterns of LSEs across both experiments that were similar to young adults with full attention rather than young adults with divided attention. In recognition, there was a null LSE in older and young adults, but a positive LSE was observed under divided attention. In contrast, in free recall, there was a positive LSE in older and young adults, but a null LSE under divided attention. Collectively, the results suggest that older adults do not have impaired encoding of context information (evidenced by intact LSE in recall), and they do not have impaired differentiation of item representations (evidenced by the null LSE in recognition). Age-related impairment in both memory tasks can be accounted for by sparse encoding of item-based information.

摘要

本研究通过扩展 REM(从记忆中有效提取)模型,检验了老年人的自由回忆和再认记忆,旨在深入了解与年龄相关的认知衰退。当列表中的某些项目通过分布式重复得到强化时,取决于记忆测试的方式,列表中未强化项目的记忆可能会受到损害,这种现象被称为列表强度效应(LSE;例如,Tulving & Hastie, 1972)。当强化操作涉及分布式重复时,LSE 在自由回忆中非常明显,但在再认中则可靠地不存在(Malmberg & Shiffrin, 2005;Ratcliff, Clark, & Shiffrin, 1990)。两项实验考察了老年人和年轻人在自由回忆和再认中的 LSE,他们使用全或分注意编码项目。尽管老年人在回忆和再认方面表现不佳,但他们在两项实验中都表现出与全注意的年轻人相似的 LSE 模式,而不是与分注意的年轻人相似。在再认中,老年人和年轻人都没有 LSE,但在分注意下则存在正的 LSE。相比之下,在自由回忆中,老年人和年轻人都存在正的 LSE,但在分注意下则不存在 LSE。总的来说,结果表明老年人对上下文信息的编码没有受损(这一点从回忆中的完整 LSE 中可以看出),他们对项目表示的区分也没有受损(这一点从再认中的无 LSE 中可以看出)。记忆任务中的年龄相关损害可以归因于项目信息的稀疏编码。

相似文献

1
List-strength effects in older adults in recognition and free recall.老年人在识别和自由回忆中的列表强度效应。
Mem Cognit. 2019 May;47(4):764-778. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0886-5.
2
Testing a Strategy-Disruption Account of the List-Strength Effect.检验列表强度效应的策略中断解释
Exp Psychol. 2020 Jul;67(4):255-275. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000494.
3
Individual differences in contextual storage: evidence from the list-strength effect.情境存储中的个体差异:来自列表强度效应的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 May;40(3):873-81. doi: 10.1037/a0035222. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
4
Modeling list-strength and spacing effects using version 3 of the retrieving effectively from memory (REM.3) model and its superimposition-of-similar-images assumption.使用记忆有效提取模型(REM.3)的第 3 版及其相似图像叠加假设来模拟列表强度和间隔效应。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Feb;53(1):4-21. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01324-z.
5
The list-strength effect in recall: relative-strength competition and retrieval inhibition may both contribute to forgetting.回忆中的列表强度效应:相对强度竞争和检索抑制可能都导致遗忘。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jan;35(1):205-20. doi: 10.1037/a0014275.
6
Age-related differences in recall and recognition: a meta-analysis.年龄相关的回忆和识别差异:荟萃分析。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Oct;26(5):1529-1547. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01649-y.
7
The "one-shot" hypothesis for context storage.情境存储的“一次性”假说。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Mar;31(2):322-36. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.322.
8
Part-list cuing effects in younger and older adults' episodic recall.部分项目提示效应对年轻和老年被试情节回忆的影响。
Psychol Aging. 2019 Mar;34(2):262-267. doi: 10.1037/pag0000268. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
9
Associative recognition and the list strength paradigm.联想识别与列表强度范式。
Mem Cognit. 2014 May;42(4):583-94. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0386-6.
10
Multielement Episodic Encoding in Young and Older Adults.年轻人和老年人的多元素情节式编码。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Jun;31(6):837-854. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01384. Epub 2019 Feb 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Modeling age differences in effects of pair repetition and proactive interference using a single parameter.使用单个参数对成对重复和前摄干扰的影响进行年龄差异建模。
Psychol Aging. 2018 Feb;33(1):182-194. doi: 10.1037/pag0000195.
2
Older adults' associative memory is modified by manner of presentation at encoding and retrieval.老年人的联想记忆在编码和检索时的呈现方式会发生改变。
Psychol Aging. 2018 Feb;33(1):82-92. doi: 10.1037/pag0000215.
3
Age-related differences in associative memory: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives.
年龄相关的联想记忆差异:实证证据与理论视角。
Psychol Aging. 2018 Feb;33(1):1-6. doi: 10.1037/pag0000235.
4
A four-component model of age-related memory change.与年龄相关的记忆变化的四成分模型。
Psychol Rev. 2016 Jan;123(1):23-69. doi: 10.1037/rev0000015. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
5
Can DRYAD explain age-related associative memory deficits?DRYAD能否解释与年龄相关的联想记忆缺陷?
Psychol Aging. 2016 Feb;31(1):1-13. doi: 10.1037/a0039071. Epub 2015 May 11.
6
Older adults do not notice their names: a new twist to a classic attention task.老年人注意不到自己的名字:经典注意力任务的新变化。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Nov;40(6):1540-50. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000020. Epub 2014 May 12.
7
Proactive effects of memory in young and older adults: the role of change recollection.记忆在年轻人和老年人中的前瞻性效应:变化回忆的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2014 Aug;42(6):950-64. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0411-4.
8
Age and response bias: evidence from the strength-based mirror effect.年龄与反应偏差:基于力量的镜像效应的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014 Oct;67(10):1910-24. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.874037. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
9
Individual differences in contextual storage: evidence from the list-strength effect.情境存储中的个体差异:来自列表强度效应的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 May;40(3):873-81. doi: 10.1037/a0035222. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
10
The co-evolution of knowledge and event memory.知识和事件记忆的共同进化。
Psychol Rev. 2013 Apr;120(2):356-94. doi: 10.1037/a0032020. Epub 2013 Mar 4.