Suleiman Ramzi
Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Israel.
J Soc Psychol. 2002 Dec;142(6):753-66. doi: 10.1080/00224540209603934.
The author investigated how Palestinian (n = 130) and Jewish (n = 153) Israeli university students perceived the collective identity of the Palestinian minority in Israel. The Palestinian and Jewish respondents perceived the "identity space" of the minority as linear, or bipolar, with 1 pole defined by the national (Palestinian) identity and the other defined by the civic (Israeli) label. The Palestinian respondents defined their collective identity in national (Palestinian, Arab) and integrative (Israeli-Palestinian) terms; the Jewish respondents perceived the minority's identity as integrative (Israeli-Palestinian). Different political outlooks among Palestinian respondents were related to their identification with the civic (Israeli) identity but not to their identification with the national (Palestinian) identity. In contrast, different political outlooks among Jewish respondents were related to their inclusion, or exclusion, of the national (Palestinian) component in their definition of the minority's identity. Implications of the results are discussed in terms of a minority acculturation model (J. Berry, J. Trimble, & E. Olmedo, 1986).
作者调查了130名巴勒斯坦裔和153名犹太裔以色列大学生如何看待以色列境内巴勒斯坦少数群体的集体身份认同。巴勒斯坦和犹太受访者将少数群体的“身份空间”视为线性的,或两极化的,一极由民族(巴勒斯坦)身份定义,另一极由公民(以色列)身份定义。巴勒斯坦受访者用民族(巴勒斯坦、阿拉伯)和融合(以色列-巴勒斯坦)的术语来定义他们的集体身份;犹太受访者则将少数群体的身份视为融合性的(以色列-巴勒斯坦)。巴勒斯坦受访者不同的政治观点与他们对公民(以色列)身份的认同有关,而与他们对民族(巴勒斯坦)身份的认同无关。相比之下,犹太受访者不同的政治观点与他们在定义少数群体身份时是否纳入民族(巴勒斯坦)成分有关。研究结果的影响将根据少数群体文化适应模型(J. 贝里、J. 特林布尔和E. 奥尔梅多,1986年)进行讨论。