Silvia Chris E, Bloswick Donald S, Lillquist Dean, Wallace David, Perkins Michael S
University of Utah, Salt Lake City 84112-9208, USA.
Work. 2002;19(1):19-34.
Multiple studies have concluded that manual patient transfer and repositioning techniques are a significant cause of low back injuries. The objective of this study was to compare the low back stresses resulting from the use of two different mechanical patient transfer assist devices with the use of traditional manual transfer techniques. The mechanical transfer systems used were the Barton Patient Transfer System and a Sling-Suspension Lift similar to a "Hoyer Lift". The back compressive forces derived using the Michigan 3D Static Strength Model (Version 4.0) and electromyography (EMG) of the muscles of the low back were compared. This study found that the mechanical assist devices placed less stress on the low back and were more desirable to use than the traditional manual techniques. The Barton System was found to be, in general, less hazardous and more preferred than the Sling Suspension Lift.
多项研究得出结论,人工搬运患者和重新安置体位的技术是导致腰部损伤的一个重要原因。本研究的目的是比较使用两种不同的机械患者搬运辅助设备与传统人工搬运技术所产生的腰部压力。所使用的机械搬运系统是巴顿患者搬运系统和一种类似于“霍耶升降机”的吊带悬挂式升降机。比较了使用密歇根3D静态强度模型(版本4.0)得出的背部压缩力和腰部肌肉的肌电图(EMG)。本研究发现,与传统人工技术相比,机械辅助设备对腰部的压力较小,且更适合使用。总体而言,巴顿系统比吊带悬挂式升降机危险性更小,更受青睐。