Sanchez-Ledesma M J, López-Olaondo L, Pueyo F J, Carrascosa F, Ortega A
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University Clinic, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Anesth Analg. 2002 Dec;95(6):1590-5, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200212000-00022.
In this study we compared the efficacy and safety of three antiemetic combinations in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Ninety ASA status I-II women, aged 18-65 yr, undergoing general anesthesia for major gynecological surgery, were included in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. A standardized anesthetic technique and postoperative analgesia (intrathecal morphine plus IV patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine) were used in all patients. Patients were randomly assigned to receive ondansetron 4 mg plus droperidol 1.25 mg after the induction of anesthesia and droperidol 1.25 mg 12 h later (Group 1, n = 30), dexamethasone 8 mg plus droperidol 1.25 mg after the induction of anesthesia and droperidol 1.25 mg 12 h later (Group 2, n = 30), or ondansetron 4 mg plus dexamethasone 8 mg after the induction of anesthesia and placebo 12 h later (Group 3, n = 30). A complete response, defined as no PONV in 48 h, occurred in 80% of patients in Group 1, 70% in Group 3, and 40% in Group 2 (P = 0.004 versus Groups 1 and 3). The incidences of side effects and other variables that could modify the incidence of PONV were similar among groups. In conclusion, ondansetron, in combination with droperidol or dexamethasone, is more effective than dexamethasone in combination with droperidol in women undergoing general anesthesia for major gynecological surgery with intrathecal morphine plus IV PCA with morphine for postoperative analgesia.
The combination of ondansetron plus dexamethasone or droperidol was significantly better than the combination of dexamethasone plus droperidol in the prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting in women undergoing general anesthesia for major gynecological surgery, with intrathecal and IV morphine (patient-controlled analgesia) for management of postoperative pain.
在本研究中,我们比较了三种止吐药联合用药预防术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的疗效和安全性。90例年龄在18 - 65岁、ASA分级为I - II级、接受大型妇科手术全身麻醉的女性纳入一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。所有患者均采用标准化麻醉技术和术后镇痛(鞘内注射吗啡加静脉自控镇痛(PCA)用吗啡)。患者被随机分配在麻醉诱导后接受昂丹司琼4mg加氟哌利多1.25mg,并在12小时后接受氟哌利多1.25mg(第1组,n = 30),或在麻醉诱导后接受地塞米松8mg加氟哌利多1.25mg,并在12小时后接受氟哌利多1.25mg(第2组,n = 30),或在麻醉诱导后接受昂丹司琼4mg加地塞米松8mg,并在12小时后接受安慰剂(第3组,n = 30)。完全缓解定义为48小时内无PONV,第1组80%的患者、第3组70%的患者和第2组40%的患者出现完全缓解(与第1组和第3组相比,P = 0.004)。各组间副作用发生率及其他可能改变PONV发生率的变量相似。总之,在接受大型妇科手术全身麻醉、采用鞘内注射吗啡加静脉PCA用吗啡进行术后镇痛的女性中,昂丹司琼联合氟哌利多或地塞米松预防PONV的效果优于地塞米松联合氟哌利多。
在接受大型妇科手术全身麻醉、采用鞘内和静脉注射吗啡(自控镇痛)处理术后疼痛的女性中,昂丹司琼加地塞米松或氟哌利多联合用药预防术后恶心呕吐的效果明显优于地塞米松加氟哌利多联合用药。