• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对因严重精神疾病而被强制住院患者的预先医疗指示。随机对照试验。

Advance directives for patients compulsorily admitted to hospital with serious mental illness. Randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Papageorgiou Alexia, King Michael, Janmohamed Anis, Davidson Oliver, Dawson John

机构信息

Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, UK.

出版信息

Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Dec;181:513-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.181.6.513.

DOI:10.1192/bjp.181.6.513
PMID:12456522
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An advance directive is a statement of a person's preferences for treatment, should he or she lose capacity to make treatment decisions in the future.

AIMS

To evaluate whether use of advance directives by patients with mental illness leads to lower rates of compulsory readmission to hospital.

METHOD

In a randomised controlled trial in two psychiatric services in inner London, 156 in-patients about to be discharged from compulsory treatment under the Mental Health Act were recruited. The trial compared usual psychiatric care with usual care plus the completion of an advance directive. The primary outcome was the rate of compulsory readmission.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients (19%) in the intervention group and 16 (21%) in the control group were readmitted compulsorily within 1 year of discharge. There was no difference in the numbers of compulsory readmissions, numbers of patients readmitted voluntarily, days spent in hospital or satisfaction with psychiatric services.

CONCLUSIONS

Users' advance instruction directives had little observable impact on the outcome of care at 12 months.

摘要

背景

预先指示是指一个人对未来失去做出治疗决定能力时的治疗偏好声明。

目的

评估精神疾病患者使用预先指示是否会降低强制再次入院率。

方法

在伦敦市中心两个精神科服务机构进行的一项随机对照试验中,招募了156名即将根据《精神健康法》结束强制治疗出院的住院患者。该试验将常规精神科护理与常规护理加完成一份预先指示进行了比较。主要结局是强制再次入院率。

结果

干预组有15名患者(19%),对照组有16名患者(21%)在出院后1年内被强制再次入院。强制再次入院人数、自愿再次入院患者人数、住院天数或对精神科服务的满意度方面没有差异。

结论

用户的预先指示指令在12个月时对护理结果几乎没有明显影响。

相似文献

1
Advance directives for patients compulsorily admitted to hospital with serious mental illness. Randomised controlled trial.针对因严重精神疾病而被强制住院患者的预先医疗指示。随机对照试验。
Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Dec;181:513-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.181.6.513.
2
Outcomes of a psycho-education and monitoring programme to prevent compulsory admission to psychiatric inpatient care: a randomised controlled trial.预防精神科住院强制性入院的心理教育和监测计划的结果:一项随机对照试验。
Psychol Med. 2018 Apr;48(5):849-860. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717002239. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
3
Effect of joint crisis plans on use of compulsory treatment in psychiatry: single blind randomised controlled trial.联合危机计划对精神科强制治疗使用情况的影响:单盲随机对照试验
BMJ. 2004 Jul 17;329(7458):136. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38155.585046.63. Epub 2004 Jul 7.
4
CRIMSON [CRisis plan IMpact: Subjective and Objective coercion and eNgagement] protocol: a randomised controlled trial of joint crisis plans to reduce compulsory treatment of people with psychosis.CRIMSON [危机计划影响:主观和客观强制和参与]方案:一项减少精神病人强制治疗的联合危机计划随机对照试验。
Trials. 2010 Nov 5;11:102. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-102.
5
Facilitated psychiatric advance directives: a randomized trial of an intervention to foster advance treatment planning among persons with severe mental illness.便利的精神科预先指示:一项针对严重精神疾病患者促进预先治疗规划干预措施的随机试验。
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;163(11):1943-51. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1943.
6
Psychiatric advance directives for people living with schizophrenia, bipolar I disorders, or schizoaffective disorders: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial - DAiP study.精神科预先指示在精神分裂症、双相情感障碍 I 型或分裂情感性障碍患者中的应用:一项随机对照试验的研究方案 - DAiP 研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Dec 27;19(1):422. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2416-9.
7
[Advanced directives in psychiatry: A review of the qualitative literature, a state-of-the-art and viewpoints].[精神病学中的预立医疗指示:定性文献综述、最新进展与观点]
Encephale. 2013 Sep;39(4):244-51. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.10.012. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
8
A comparison of hospital and community stay in patients who underwent compulsory admission before and after the 2007 Amendment to the Mental Health Act in Taiwan.台湾《精神卫生法》2007年修正案前后强制入院患者的住院与社区停留情况比较。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2018 May-Jun;58:87-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.02.012. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
9
The use of advance directives by persons with serious mental illness for psychiatric treatment.
Psychiatr Q. 2000 Spring;71(1):1-13. doi: 10.1023/a:1004660915824.
10
Interest in psychiatric advance directives among high users of crisis services and hospitalization.危机服务和住院治疗的高使用人群对精神科预先指示的兴趣。
Psychiatr Serv. 2003 Jul;54(7):981-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.54.7.981.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychiatric advance directives facilitated by peer workers among people with mental illness: economic evaluation of a randomized controlled trial (DAiP study).同伴工作人员促进精神疾病患者的精神科预先指示:一项随机对照试验(DAiP 研究)的经济评估。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2023 Apr 25;32:e27. doi: 10.1017/S2045796023000197.
2
Clinician knowledge and attitudes of mental health advance statements in Victoria, Australia.澳大利亚维多利亚州临床医生对心理健康预先指示的知识和态度。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Oct;31(5):1164-1175. doi: 10.1111/inm.13022. Epub 2022 May 20.
3
Socio-Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Adults With Psychotic Symptomatology Under Involuntary Admission and Readmission for Compulsory Treatment in a Referral Psychiatric Hospital in Cyprus.
塞浦路斯一家转诊精神病医院中因强制治疗而被非自愿收治和再次收治的有精神病症状的成年人的社会人口学和临床特征。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 17;12:602274. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.602274. eCollection 2021.
4
Professionals' perspectives on factors within primary mental health services that can affect pathways to involuntary psychiatric admissions.专业人士对初级心理健康服务中可能影响非自愿精神科住院途径的因素的看法。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020 Nov 19;14(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s13033-020-00417-z.
5
Advance Decision Making in Bipolar: A Systematic Review.双相情感障碍中的预先决策制定:一项系统综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 16;11:538107. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.538107. eCollection 2020.
6
Stakeholder perspective on barrier to the implementation of Advance Care Planning in a traditionally paternalistic healthcare system.利益相关者对传统家长式医疗体系中实施预立医疗照护计划的障碍的看法。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 10;15(11):e0242085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242085. eCollection 2020.
7
Australian Psychiatrists' Support for Psychiatric Advance Directives: Responses to a Hypothetical Vignette.澳大利亚精神科医生对精神科预先指示的支持:对一个假设案例的回应。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2016 Jul 20;24(1):61-73. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2016.1198224. eCollection 2017.
8
Preventing and reducing 'coercion' in mental health services: an international scoping review of English-language studies.预防和减少精神卫生服务中的“强制”现象:一项针对英文文献的国际范围综述。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020 Jul;142(1):27-39. doi: 10.1111/acps.13152. Epub 2020 Feb 9.
9
Psychiatric advance directives for people living with schizophrenia, bipolar I disorders, or schizoaffective disorders: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial - DAiP study.精神科预先指示在精神分裂症、双相情感障碍 I 型或分裂情感性障碍患者中的应用:一项随机对照试验的研究方案 - DAiP 研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Dec 27;19(1):422. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2416-9.
10
Crisis-planning interventions for people with psychotic illness or bipolar disorder: systematic review and meta-analyses.针对精神病性疾病或双相情感障碍患者的危机规划干预措施:系统评价与荟萃分析
BJPsych Open. 2019 Jun 13;5(4):e53. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2019.28.