Srebnik Debra S, Russo Joan, Sage Julie, Peto Tracy, Zick Ellen
Department of Psychiatry and Behavorial Sciences, University of Washington in Seattle, Harborview Medical Center, Box 359911, 325 9th Avenue, Seattle, Washington, 98104, USA.
Psychiatr Serv. 2003 Jul;54(7):981-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.54.7.981.
This study examined rates of interest in creating psychiatric advance directives among individuals at risk of psychiatric crises in which these directives might be used and variables associated with interest in the directives.
The participants were 303 adults with serious and persistent mental illnesses who were receiving community mental health services and who had experienced at least two psychiatric crises in the previous two years. Case managers introduced the concepts of the directives and assessed participants' interest. The associations between interest in the directives and demographic characteristics, psychiatric symptoms, level of functioning, diagnosis, history of hospitalizations, history of outpatient commitment orders, support for the directives by case managers, and site differences were examined.
Interest in creating a directive was expressed by 161 participants (53 percent). Variables significantly associated with interest were support for the directives by a participant's case manager and having no outpatient commitment orders in the previous two years. Reasons for interest included using the directives in anticipation of additional crises and as a vehicle to help ensure provision of preferred treatment.
Substantial interest in psychiatric advance directives was shown among individuals with serious and persistent mental illness. The results strongly suggested that attitudes of clinicians about psychiatric advance directives are associated with interest in the directives among these individuals. Therefore, it is important to educate clinicians and address their concerns about the directives so that they can more comfortably support creating the documents. A shift in values may also be necessary to more consistently recognize and honor patients' treatment preferences as specified in the directives.
本研究调查了有精神危机风险且可能使用精神科预先指示的个体对制定此类指示的兴趣率,以及与对这些指示的兴趣相关的变量。
参与者为303名患有严重且持续性精神疾病的成年人,他们正在接受社区心理健康服务,且在过去两年中经历过至少两次精神危机。个案管理员介绍了指示的概念,并评估了参与者的兴趣。研究考察了对指示的兴趣与人口统计学特征、精神症状、功能水平、诊断、住院史、门诊强制治疗令史、个案管理员对指示的支持以及地点差异之间的关联。
161名参与者(53%)表示有兴趣制定指示。与兴趣显著相关的变量是参与者的个案管理员对指示的支持,以及过去两年中没有门诊强制治疗令。感兴趣的原因包括预期在更多危机中使用指示,以及将其作为确保获得首选治疗的一种手段。
患有严重且持续性精神疾病的个体对精神科预先指示表现出了浓厚兴趣。结果强烈表明,临床医生对精神科预先指示的态度与这些个体对指示的兴趣相关。因此,对临床医生进行教育并解决他们对指示的担忧非常重要,这样他们就能更自在地支持制定这些文件。价值观的转变可能也很有必要,以便更一致地认可和尊重指示中规定的患者治疗偏好。