Shanely R Andrew, Coast J Richard
Department of Exercise Science, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Ariz., USA.
Respiration. 2002;69(6):534-41. doi: 10.1159/000066459.
Following strenuous exercise, in vivo diaphragmatic strength has been reported to decrease. This decrease has been suggested to result from an increase in metabolic by-products of intense exercise.
We tested the hypothesis that physiological NH(3) concentrations adversely affect diaphragmatic contractility, fatigability, and recovery.
Rat diaphragm strips were exposed to one of six experimental conditions (n = 6 per condition): Krebs-Ringer control solution, or the control solution with NH(3) added (in mM): 0.11, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0, or 14.0. Initial diaphragmatic contractility was assessed with the force-frequency response in the control solution. Following the first force-frequency response, the solution was replaced with one of the six solutions and a second force-frequency response was measured. Strips were then subjected to a short fatigue protocol and contractility was reassessed with a third force-frequency response. A longer fatigue protocol was then administered, followed by a 20-min recovery assessment period.
Ammonia significantly (p < 0.05) reduced diaphragmatic contractility, but only at concentrations of 5 mM or greater. Additionally, ammonia did not alter the rate of fatigue.
This study suggests that physiological NH(3) concentrations do not adversely affect in vitro diaphragmatic contractility, fatigue, or recovery. These data are not consistent with diaphragmatic fatigue associated with exercise induced by arterial concentrations of NH(3) seen in humans, although further testing in situ or in vivo is needed.
据报道,剧烈运动后体内膈肌力量会下降。有人认为这种下降是剧烈运动代谢副产物增加所致。
我们检验了这样一种假设,即生理浓度的氨会对膈肌收缩力、疲劳性和恢复产生不利影响。
将大鼠膈肌条暴露于六种实验条件之一(每种条件n = 6): Krebs-Ringer对照溶液,或添加了氨(以毫摩尔计)的对照溶液:0.11、2.5、5.0、10.0或14.0。在对照溶液中用力量-频率反应评估初始膈肌收缩力。在第一次力量-频率反应后,将溶液换成六种溶液之一,并测量第二次力量-频率反应。然后对肌条进行短时间疲劳方案,并用第三次力量-频率反应重新评估收缩力。接着实施更长时间的疲劳方案,随后是20分钟的恢复评估期。
氨显著(p < 0.05)降低了膈肌收缩力,但仅在浓度为5 mM或更高时。此外,氨并未改变疲劳速率。
本研究表明,生理浓度的氨不会对体外膈肌收缩力、疲劳或恢复产生不利影响。这些数据与人类中因动脉血氨浓度升高导致的运动相关性膈肌疲劳不一致,尽管还需要在原位或体内进行进一步测试。