• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

撤除生命支持:临终时的重症护理。

Withdrawal of life support: intensive caring at the end of life.

作者信息

Prendergast Thomas J, Puntillo Kathleen A

机构信息

Departments of Medicine and Anesthesiology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (3D), 1 Medical Center Dr, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 2002 Dec 4;288(21):2732-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.21.2732.

DOI:10.1001/jama.288.21.2732
PMID:12460097
Abstract

The technology and expertise of critical care practice support patients through life-threatening illnesses. Most recover; some die quickly; others, however, linger--neither improving nor acutely dying, alive but with a dwindling capacity to recover from their injury or illness. Management of these patients is often dominated by the question: Is it appropriate to continue life-sustaining therapy? Patients rarely participate in these pivotal discussions because they are either too sick or too heavily sedated. As a result, the decision often falls to the family or the surrogate decision maker, in consultation with the medical team. Decisions of such import are emotionally stressful and are often a source of disagreement. Failure to resolve such disagreements may create conflict that compromises patient care, engenders guilt among family members, and creates dissatisfaction for health care professionals. However, the potential for strained communications is mitigated if clinicians provide timely clinical and prognostic information and support the patient and family with aggressive symptom control, a comfortable setting, and continuous psychosocial support. Effective communication includes sharing the burden of decision making with family members. This shift from individual responsibility to patient-focused consensus often permits the family to understand, perhaps reluctantly and with great sadness, that intensive caring may involve letting go of life-sustaining interventions.

摘要

重症监护实践的技术和专业知识帮助患者度过危及生命的疾病。大多数患者康复;一些患者很快死亡;然而,其他患者则徘徊不前——既没有好转也没有急剧死亡,活着但从损伤或疾病中恢复的能力不断下降。对这些患者的管理往往围绕着一个问题:继续维持生命的治疗是否合适?患者很少参与这些关键讨论,因为他们要么病得太重,要么镇静过度。因此,决定往往落在家属或替代决策者身上,并与医疗团队协商。如此重要的决定在情感上压力巨大,而且往往是分歧的根源。未能解决此类分歧可能会引发冲突,损害患者护理,使家庭成员产生内疚感,并让医护人员感到不满。然而,如果临床医生及时提供临床和预后信息,并通过积极控制症状、营造舒适环境以及持续提供心理社会支持来帮助患者及其家属,那么沟通紧张的可能性就会降低。有效的沟通包括与家庭成员分担决策负担。这种从个人责任到以患者为中心的共识的转变,往往能让家属理解,也许是不情愿且带着巨大悲伤地理解,强化护理可能意味着放弃维持生命的干预措施。

相似文献

1
Withdrawal of life support: intensive caring at the end of life.撤除生命支持:临终时的重症护理。
JAMA. 2002 Dec 4;288(21):2732-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.21.2732.
2
Letting go: family willingness to forgo life support.放手:家属放弃生命维持治疗的意愿。
Heart Lung. 1996 Nov-Dec;25(6):483-94. doi: 10.1016/s0147-9563(96)80051-3.
3
Conflict associated with decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment in intensive care units.重症监护病房中与限制维持生命治疗决策相关的冲突。
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 May;16(5):283-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.00419.x.
4
Life support withdrawal: communication and conflict.生命支持撤除:沟通与冲突
Am J Crit Care. 2003 Nov;12(6):548-55.
5
Family dynamics in end-of-life treatment decisions.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1994 Jul;16(4):251-8. doi: 10.1016/0163-8343(94)90004-3.
6
Families looking back: one year after discussion of withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining support.回首往事的家庭:关于撤除或 withholding 生命维持支持讨论后的一年 (注:withholding 在这里结合语境推测可能是“不予实施”之类意思,但原文未完整准确翻译该词,可能是原文有误或不完整)
Crit Care Med. 2001 Jan;29(1):197-201. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200101000-00040.
7
End-of-life decision making in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房中的临终决策
Intensive Care Med. 2000 Oct;26(10):1414-20. doi: 10.1007/s001340000641.
8
Family decision-making to withdraw life-sustaining treatments from hospitalized patients.家庭关于停止对住院患者进行维持生命治疗的决策。
Nurs Res. 2001 Mar-Apr;50(2):105-15. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200103000-00006.
9
The negotiation of death: clinical decision making at the end of life.死亡的协商:临终时的临床决策
Soc Sci Med. 1992 Aug;35(3):251-9. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90021-h.
10
Family discussions on life-sustaining interventions in neurocritical care.神经重症监护中关于维持生命干预措施的家庭讨论。
Handb Clin Neurol. 2017;140:397-408. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63600-3.00022-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcultural Adaptation and Validation of Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire in Medical Intensive Care Units in South Korea.韩国重症监护病房中《死亡与临终质量问卷》的跨文化调适与验证
Acute Crit Care. 2018 May;33(2):95-101. doi: 10.4266/acc.2017.00612. Epub 2018 May 31.
2
End-of-Life and Bereavement Care in Pediatric Intensive Care Units.儿科重症监护病房的临终关怀与哀伤护理
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2017 Oct;64(5):1167-1183. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
3
The Trial of Ascertaining Individual Preferences for Loved Ones' Role in End-of-Life Decisions (TAILORED) Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Surrogate Decision Making.
确定亲人在生命末期决策中角色偏好的试验(TAILORED):一项改善代理决策的随机对照试验。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Oct;54(4):455-465. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
4
[Patients' declared intentions and emergency medicine].[患者声明的意图与急诊医学]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2016 Mar;111(2):113-7. doi: 10.1007/s00063-015-0086-z. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
5
End-of-Life Decisions about Withholding or Withdrawing Therapy: Medical, Ethical, and Religio-Cultural Considerations.关于停止或撤销治疗的临终决策:医学、伦理及宗教文化考量
Palliat Care. 2013 Mar 10;7:1-5. doi: 10.4137/PCRT.S10796. eCollection 2013.
6
A comparison of the willingness of resident and attending physicians to comply with the requests of patients at the end of life.住院医师和主治医生在临终时遵从患者请求意愿的比较。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jul;29(7):1048-54. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2830-0. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
7
Development of a post-intensive care unit storytelling intervention for surrogates involved in decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment.为参与限制维持生命治疗决策的替代者开发重症监护病房后叙事干预措施。
Palliat Support Care. 2015 Jun;13(3):451-63. doi: 10.1017/S1478951513001211. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
8
Timing of limitations in life support in acute lung injury patients: a multisite study*.急性肺损伤患者生命支持限制时间:一项多中心研究*。
Crit Care Med. 2014 Feb;42(2):296-302. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a272db.
9
Amniotic fluid embolism.羊水栓塞
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2013 Jan;3(1):51-7. doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.109422.
10
Increased nonbeneficial care in patients spending their birthday in the ICU.生日当天在 ICU 住院的患者接受了更多无益的治疗。
Intensive Care Med. 2012 Jul;38(7):1169-76. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2510-7. Epub 2012 Feb 10.