• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

放手:家属放弃生命维持治疗的意愿。

Letting go: family willingness to forgo life support.

作者信息

Swigart V, Lidz C, Butterworth V, Arnold R

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.

出版信息

Heart Lung. 1996 Nov-Dec;25(6):483-94. doi: 10.1016/s0147-9563(96)80051-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0147-9563(96)80051-3
PMID:8950128
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the process of family decision making about life support in the critical care setting.

DESIGN

Descriptive, exploratory.

SETTING

A northeastern United States university-affiliated medical intensive care unit.

SAMPLE

Thirty family members of 16 critically ill patients.

RESULTS

Letting go or becoming willing to forgo life support involved three interrelated and complex processes: (1) family members sought out, obtained, and tried to understand information about the critical illness; (2) they reviewed the life story of the patient, seeking meaning in the patient's life and the critical illness; and (3) they struggled to maintain family roles and relationships. For most families, interpersonal and intrapsychic work during each process created a reframing of the issues related to the critical illness: (1) they came to believe that they had done all that could be done and were able then to relinquish the goal of recovery for acceptance of a peaceful death; (2) they reviewed the patients's life, finding some meaning and a sense that, given the situation, the patient would not want to continue on life support, and then they moved toward closure; and (3) they were able to bring about (at least within a small group of the closest family members) a sense of doing the "right thing", and they were able to develop some sense that forgoing life support for the ill relative would not destroy important family relationships. For a few other families this movement toward resolution did not occur, and although family members attempted to deal with the issues of life support, their efforts were fraught with conflict and prolongation of the end-of-life period.

CONCLUSIONS

Little is known about the actual experience of family members as they are involved in life-support decision making. Identification of the needs of family members to work through the decision-making experience cognitively, emotionally, and morally is essential to communicating effectively about the ill relative's condition and to providing understanding and support to families involved in life-support decision making in the critical care unit.

摘要

目的

描述重症监护环境下家庭关于生命维持治疗决策的过程。

设计

描述性、探索性研究。

地点

美国东北部一所大学附属医院的重症监护病房。

样本

16名重症患者的30名家庭成员。

结果

放手或愿意放弃生命维持治疗涉及三个相互关联且复杂的过程:(1)家庭成员寻找、获取并试图理解有关重症疾病的信息;(2)他们回顾患者的人生经历,探寻患者生命及重症疾病的意义;(3)他们努力维持家庭角色和关系。对大多数家庭而言,每个过程中的人际及内心工作促使他们对与重症疾病相关的问题进行重新审视:(1)他们开始相信自己已竭尽全力,从而能够放弃康复目标,接受安详离世;(2)他们回顾患者的人生,找到一些意义,并感觉到鉴于病情,患者不会希望继续接受生命维持治疗,然后他们走向结局的终结;(3)他们能够(至少在一小群最亲密的家庭成员中)产生一种做“正确之事”的感觉,并且能够形成一种认知,即放弃为患病亲属提供生命维持治疗不会破坏重要的家庭关系。对于其他一些家庭,这种走向解决的过程并未发生,尽管家庭成员试图处理生命维持治疗的问题,但他们的努力充满冲突,延长了生命末期。

结论

对于家庭成员参与生命维持治疗决策的实际经历了解甚少。识别家庭成员在认知、情感和道德层面经历决策过程的需求,对于就患病亲属的病情进行有效沟通以及为参与重症监护病房生命维持治疗决策的家庭提供理解与支持至关重要。

相似文献

1
Letting go: family willingness to forgo life support.放手:家属放弃生命维持治疗的意愿。
Heart Lung. 1996 Nov-Dec;25(6):483-94. doi: 10.1016/s0147-9563(96)80051-3.
2
Family decision-making to withdraw life-sustaining treatments from hospitalized patients.家庭关于停止对住院患者进行维持生命治疗的决策。
Nurs Res. 2001 Mar-Apr;50(2):105-15. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200103000-00006.
3
Conflict associated with decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment in intensive care units.重症监护病房中与限制维持生命治疗决策相关的冲突。
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 May;16(5):283-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.00419.x.
4
Family members' informal roles in end-of-life decision making in adult intensive care units.成年重症监护病房中,家庭成员在临终决策中的非正式角色。
Am J Crit Care. 2012 Jan;21(1):43-51. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2012520.
5
Withholding and withdrawing of life support from patients with severe head injury.对重度颅脑损伤患者生命支持的撤除与 withholding(此处“withholding”结合语境推测意思是“停止给予”之类,因未完整语境较难精准翻译)
Crit Care Med. 1995 Sep;23(9):1567-75. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199509000-00018.
6
The negotiation of death: clinical decision making at the end of life.死亡的协商:临终时的临床决策
Soc Sci Med. 1992 Aug;35(3):251-9. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90021-h.
7
Families looking back: one year after discussion of withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining support.回首往事的家庭:关于撤除或 withholding 生命维持支持讨论后的一年 (注:withholding 在这里结合语境推测可能是“不予实施”之类意思,但原文未完整准确翻译该词,可能是原文有误或不完整)
Crit Care Med. 2001 Jan;29(1):197-201. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200101000-00040.
8
Withdrawal of life support: intensive caring at the end of life.撤除生命支持:临终时的重症护理。
JAMA. 2002 Dec 4;288(21):2732-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.21.2732.
9
Results of a clinical trial on care improvement for the critically ill.一项针对危重症护理改善的临床试验结果。
Crit Care Med. 2003 Aug;31(8):2107-17. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000069732.65524.72.
10
Determinants in Canadian health care workers of the decision to withdraw life support from the critically ill. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group.加拿大医护人员对重症患者停止生命支持决策的影响因素。加拿大重症监护试验组。
JAMA. 1995 Mar 1;273(9):703-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Limitation of life sustaining therapy in disorders of consciousness: ethics and practice.限制生命支持治疗在意识障碍中的应用:伦理与实践。
Brain. 2024 Jul 5;147(7):2274-2288. doi: 10.1093/brain/awae060.
2
The Science of Context: Transforming Serious Illness Care Though In Situ Observation.语境的科学:通过现场观察改变重病护理
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Jun;63(6):e651-e653. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.01.021.
3
Artificial Intelligence for Caregivers of Persons With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: Systematic Literature Review.
针对阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症患者护理人员的人工智能:系统文献综述
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Aug 20;8(8):e18189. doi: 10.2196/18189.
4
Association of Family Ratings of Quality of End-of-Life Care With Stopping Dialysis Treatment and Receipt of Hospice Services.家庭对终末期医疗护理质量的评价与停止透析治疗和获得临终关怀服务的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1913115. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.13115.
5
Mobile Health, Information Preferences, and Surrogate Decision-Making Preferences of Family Caregivers of People With Dementia in Rural Hispanic Communities: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.农村西班牙裔社区痴呆症患者家庭照顾者的移动健康、信息偏好及替代决策偏好:横断面问卷调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Dec 10;20(12):e11682. doi: 10.2196/11682.
6
A scoping review of family experience and need during end of life care in intensive care.重症监护临终关怀期间家庭经历与需求的范围综述
Nurs Open. 2015 Mar 2;2(1):24-35. doi: 10.1002/nop2.14. eCollection 2015 Apr.
7
Nurse-led intervention to improve surrogate decision making for patients with advanced critical illness.护士主导的干预措施,以改善晚期危重症患者的替代决策。
Am J Crit Care. 2012 Nov;21(6):396-409. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2012223.
8
Communicating with clinicians: the experiences of surrogate decision-makers for hospitalized older adults.与临床医生沟通:住院老年患者的代理人的经验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Aug;60(8):1401-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04086.x. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
9
Life-sustaining treatment decisions in the ICU for patients with ESLD: a prospective investigation.终末期肝病患者 ICU 中生命维持治疗决策:一项前瞻性研究。
Res Nurs Health. 2012 Oct;35(5):518-32. doi: 10.1002/nur.21488. Epub 2012 May 11.
10
Use of augmentative and alternative communication strategies by family members in the intensive care unit.患者家属在重症监护病房中使用辅助沟通策略。
Am J Crit Care. 2012 Mar;21(2):e21-32. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2012752.