Fogari Roberto, Preti Paola, Zoppi Annalisa, Rinaldi Andrea, Corradi Luca, Pasotti Carlo, Poletti Luigi, Marasi GianLuigi, Derosa Giuseppe, Mugellini Amedeo, Voglini Carlo, Lazzari Pierangelo
Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, Clinica Medica IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Am J Hypertens. 2002 Dec;15(12):1042-9. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(02)03017-0.
The aim of this study is to compare the long-term effect of amlodipine and fosinopril in monotherapy or in combination on urinary albumin excretion (UAE) in hypertensive diabetic patients.
We selected 453 hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria and randomized them to amlodipine (5 to 15 mg/day), fosinopril (10 to 30 mg/day), or amlodipine plus fosinopril (5/10 to 15/30 mg/day) for a 3-month titration period. The nonresponder patients or those complaining of side effects during the titration period were discontinued (n = 144); the remaining 309 patients were enrolled in the trial and treated with the same therapy for 4 years. Every 6 months, blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), UAE, creatinine clearance, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were evaluated.
The combination therapy was more effective in reducing BP than either drug alone at any time of the study without affecting glucose homeostasis. All three treatments provided a significant decrease in UAE during the 48-month study period. However, this effect was more pronounced and became evident earlier with fosinopril than with amlodipine monotherapy (after 3 v 18 months of therapy). In addition, the combination therapy provided a greater antialbuminuric effect than the single drugs. This could be due to the greater antihypertensive effects, although other drug-specific effects cannot be excluded. The cardiovascular outcomes were similar in the amlodipine and in the fosinopril group, but they were lower in the combination group.
These results strengthen the rationale to use a calcium-antagonist/angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor combination in the treatment of hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes.
本研究旨在比较氨氯地平和福辛普利单药治疗或联合治疗对高血压糖尿病患者尿白蛋白排泄量(UAE)的长期影响。
我们选取了453例2型糖尿病合并微量白蛋白尿的高血压患者,并将他们随机分为氨氯地平组(5至15毫克/天)、福辛普利组(10至30毫克/天)或氨氯地平加福辛普利组(5/10至15/30毫克/天),进行为期3个月的滴定期。滴定期内无反应的患者或出现副作用的患者被停用(n = 144);其余309例患者纳入试验,接受相同治疗4年。每6个月评估一次血压(BP)、心率(HR)、UAE、肌酐清除率和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)。
在研究的任何时间,联合治疗在降低血压方面比任何一种单药治疗更有效,且不影响葡萄糖稳态。在48个月的研究期内,所有三种治疗均使UAE显著降低。然而,福辛普利比氨氯地平单药治疗的这种效果更显著且出现得更早(治疗3个月对比18个月后)。此外,联合治疗比单药治疗具有更大的抗白蛋白尿作用。这可能是由于更强的降压作用,尽管不能排除其他药物特异性作用。氨氯地平组和福辛普利组的心血管结局相似,但联合组更低。
这些结果强化了在治疗2型糖尿病高血压患者时使用钙拮抗剂/血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂联合治疗的理论依据。