Liang Jialang, Lan Jiarong, Tang Qizhi, Ling Wenjing, Li Min
Endocrinology Department, Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Guangdong Province, Foshan, Guangdong 528200, P.R. China.
Nephrology Department, Huzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Huzhou, Zhejiang 313000, P.R. China.
Exp Ther Med. 2021 Jan;21(1):14. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.9446. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
Treatments with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or calcium channel blockers (CCBs) may delay the development of albuminuria in patients with early diabetic nephropathy. However, evidence in the literature has not been consistent. The present meta-analysis aimed to compare the short- and long-term therapeutic effects of ACE inhibitors and CCBs (when used separately) for preventing the progression of nephropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus. A comprehensive search of various databases was performed from inception until March 2015 for studies in the Chinese and English languages. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of ACE inhibitors with that of CCBs in patients with early diabetic nephropathy were considered. A total of 12 RCTs were included with a total of 947 patients. ACE inhibitors were indicated to be more effective in reducing the albumin excretion rate than CCBs after short-term treatments (<6 months) [mean difference (MD), 32.35; 95% confidence interval (CI), 31.62-33.07; P<0.00001]. There was no difference in serum creatinine values after treatment with either drug (MD, 8.7; 95% CI, -21.5-38.91; P=0.57). Data from six studies were used to compare long-term treatment effects (≥1 year). In terms of progression to normoalbuminuria, a marginal difference was obtained between the two drugs with better outcomes with ACE inhibitors [odds ratio (OR), 0.70; 95% CI, 0.49-1.00; P=0.05]. There was no statistically significant difference between ACE inhibitors and CCBs regarding the progression from microalbuminuria to macroalbuminuria (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 0.82-3.87; P=0.15). In conclusion, the present study indicated that the antiproteinuric efficacy of CCBs may be less than that of ACE inhibitors after short-term treatment in patients with DN. However, both types of drugs are equally effective in reducing the progression of microalbuminuria to macroalbuminuria in the long term.
使用血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂或钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)进行治疗可能会延缓早期糖尿病肾病患者蛋白尿的发展。然而,文献中的证据并不一致。本荟萃分析旨在比较ACE抑制剂和CCB(单独使用时)预防糖尿病患者肾病进展的短期和长期治疗效果。从数据库建立至2015年3月,对各种数据库进行了全面检索,纳入中英文研究。考虑采用随机对照试验(RCT)比较ACE抑制剂与CCB对早期糖尿病肾病患者的疗效。共纳入12项RCT,总计947例患者。短期治疗(<6个月)后,ACE抑制剂在降低白蛋白排泄率方面比CCB更有效[平均差(MD),32.35;95%置信区间(CI),31.62 - 33.07;P<0.00001]。两种药物治疗后血清肌酐值无差异(MD,8.7;95% CI,-21.5 - 38.91;P = 0.57)。六项研究的数据用于比较长期治疗效果(≥1年)。在进展为正常白蛋白尿方面,两种药物之间存在微小差异,ACE抑制剂效果更好[比值比(OR),0.70;95% CI,0.49 - 1.00;P = 0.05]。在从微量白蛋白尿进展为大量白蛋白尿方面,ACE抑制剂与CCB之间无统计学显著差异(OR,1.78;95% CI,0.82 - 3.87;P = 0.15)。总之,本研究表明,在糖尿病肾病患者短期治疗后,CCB的抗蛋白尿疗效可能低于ACE抑制剂。然而,两种药物在长期降低微量白蛋白尿进展为大量白蛋白尿方面同样有效。