峰电位时间依赖性可塑性的机制与意义。
Mechanisms and significance of spike-timing dependent plasticity.
作者信息
Karmarkar Uma R, Najarian Mark T, Buonomano Dean V
机构信息
Department of Neurobiology, University of California Los Angeles, Box 951763, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
出版信息
Biol Cybern. 2002 Dec;87(5-6):373-82. doi: 10.1007/s00422-002-0351-0.
Hebb's original postulate left two important issues unaddressed: (i) what is the effective time window between pre- and postsynaptic activity that will result in potentiation? and (ii) what is the learning rule that underlies decreases in synaptic strength? While research over the past 2 decades has addressed these questions, several studies within the past 5 years have shown that synapses undergo long-term depression (LTD) or long-term potentiation (LTP) depending on the order of activity in the pre- and postsynaptic cells. This process has been referred to as spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP). Here we discuss the experimental data on STDP, and develop models of the mechanisms that may underlie it. Specifically, we examine whether the standard model of LTP and LTD in which high and low levels of Ca(2+) produce LTP and LTD, respectively, can also account for STDP. We conclude that the standard model can account for a type of STDP in which, counterintuitively, LTD will be observed at some intervals in which the presynaptic cell fires before the postsynaptic cell. This form of STDP will also be sensitive to parameters such as the presence of an after depolarization following an action potential. Indeed, the sensitivity of this type of STDP to experimental parameters suggests that it may not play an important physiological role in vivo. We suggest that more robust forms of STDP, which do not exhibit LTD at pre-before-post intervals, are not accounted for by the standard model, and are likely to rely on a second coincidence detector in addition to the NMDA receptor.
赫布最初的假设留下了两个未解决的重要问题
(i)突触前和突触后活动之间导致增强作用的有效时间窗口是多久?以及(ii)突触强度降低背后的学习规则是什么?虽然过去20年的研究已经解决了这些问题,但过去5年的几项研究表明,突触会根据突触前和突触后细胞活动的顺序经历长期抑制(LTD)或长期增强(LTP)。这个过程被称为尖峰时间依赖性可塑性(STDP)。在这里,我们讨论关于STDP的实验数据,并建立可能作为其基础的机制模型。具体来说,我们研究了分别由高钙和低钙水平产生LTP和LTD的LTP和LTD标准模型是否也能解释STDP。我们得出结论,标准模型可以解释一种类型的STDP,其中,与直觉相反,在突触前细胞先于突触后细胞放电的某些时间间隔会观察到LTD。这种形式的STDP也将对诸如动作电位后去极化的存在等参数敏感。事实上,这种类型的STDP对实验参数的敏感性表明它可能在体内不发挥重要的生理作用。我们认为,更强大的STDP形式,即在突触前先于突触后时间间隔不表现出LTD的形式,无法由标准模型解释,并且可能除了NMDA受体之外还依赖于第二个巧合探测器。