Suppr超能文献

成人获得性言语失用症与发育性言语失用症的对比问题。

Issues contrasting adult acquired versus developmental apraxia of speech.

作者信息

Maassen Ben

机构信息

Child Neurology Center/Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Semin Speech Lang. 2002 Nov;23(4):257-66. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-35804.

Abstract

Acquired and developmental apraxia of speech (AOS and DAS) are defined as disorders of the transition from an abstract phonological code into motor commands. However, the natural course of these disorders differs substantially because of the fundamental difference in the developmental stage at which the apraxia expresses itself. In normal and pathological development alike, development of language and speech is an interactive process, involving speech motor control, perception, and psycholinguistic processes. Infant speech develops from random babbling and sensomotoric learning, followed by more abstract phonological acquisition. Supposing that the core deficit of DAS comprises a reduced sensomotoric learning capacity explains a large part of the symptomatology of DAS in the psycholinguistic domain because of the impact on phonological, perceptual, and higher-level processes. This contrasts with adults with AOS, who already have acquired stable top-down processes. Implications for clinical management are discussed.

摘要

获得性和发育性言语失用症(AOS和DAS)被定义为从抽象语音编码向运动指令转换的障碍。然而,由于失用症表现自身的发育阶段存在根本差异,这些障碍的自然病程有很大不同。在正常和病理发育过程中,语言和言语的发展都是一个交互过程,涉及言语运动控制、感知和心理语言学过程。婴儿言语从随机咿呀学语和感觉运动学习发展而来,随后是更抽象的语音习得。假设DAS的核心缺陷包括感觉运动学习能力下降,这可以解释DAS在心理语言学领域的大部分症状,因为它会影响语音、感知和更高层次的过程。这与患有AOS的成年人形成对比,他们已经获得了稳定的自上而下的过程。文中还讨论了对临床管理的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验