Croot Karen
Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Australia.
Semin Speech Lang. 2002 Nov;23(4):267-80. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-35800.
Presented in this article is a discussion of current progress in behavioral, cognitive, and neuroanatomic definitions of apraxia of speech (AOS). A behavioral definition summarizes the speech symptoms that should be considered diagnostic of AOS with or without co-occurring aphasia and dysarthria. AOS is defined in cognitive terms as an impairment in the translation of phonological representations into specifications for articulation. Progress toward a neuroanatomic definition of AOS will rely on mapping the processes described by increasingly sophisticated cognitive models of normal speech production to the brain. The article describes criteria that have been proposed for differentiating apraxic from phonological and dysarthric disorders and suggests that syndrome-based approaches to the diagnosis of AOS may obscure important differences between individual presentations of apraxic disruption as well as similarities between AOS and other speech-language disorders.
本文讨论了言语失用症(AOS)在行为、认知和神经解剖学定义方面的当前进展。行为定义总结了无论是否伴有失语症和构音障碍都应被视为AOS诊断依据的言语症状。AOS在认知方面被定义为将语音表征转化为发音规范的过程受损。AOS神经解剖学定义的进展将依赖于把正常言语产生的日益复杂的认知模型所描述的过程映射到大脑。本文描述了用于区分失用性言语障碍与语音和构音障碍的标准,并指出基于综合征的AOS诊断方法可能会掩盖失用性言语障碍个体表现之间的重要差异以及AOS与其他言语语言障碍之间的相似性。