Robert P H, Clairet S, Benoit M, Koutaich J, Bertogliati C, Tible O, Caci H, Borg M, Brocker P, Bedoucha P
Centre Mémoire, Unité d'Evaluation des Cognitions, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, France.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2002 Dec;17(12):1099-105. doi: 10.1002/gps.755.
This study was designed to establish the validity and reliability of the apathy inventory (IA), a rating scale for global assessment of apathy and separate assessment of emotional blunting, lack of initiative, and lack of interest.
Information for the IA can be obtained from the patient or from a caregiver. We evaluated 115 subjects using the IA, consisting of 19 healthy elderly subjects, 24 patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), 12 subjects with Parkinson's disease (PD) and 60 subjects with Alzheimer's disease (AD).
Internal consistency, item reliability, and between-rater reliability were high. A test-retest reliability study demonstrated that caregiver responses to IA questions were stable over short intervals. A concurrent validity study showed that the IA assesses apathy as effectively as the Neuro Psychiatric Inventory apathy domain. In the caregiver-based evaluation, AD subjects had significantly higher scores than controls, both for global apathy score and for the lack of interest dimension. When the AD patients were subdivided according to diagnostic criteria for apathy, apathetic patients had significantly higher scores than non apathetic patients. With the patient-based evaluations, no differences were found among the AD, MCI and control groups. The scores in the patient-based evaluations were only higher for the PD group versus the control subjects. The results also indicated that AD patients had poor awareness of their emotional blunting and lack of initiative.
The IA is a reliable method for assessing in demented and non-demented elderly subjects several dimensions of the apathetic syndrome, and also the subject's awareness of these symptoms.
本研究旨在确立淡漠量表(IA)的有效性和可靠性,该量表用于全面评估淡漠以及分别评估情感迟钝、缺乏主动性和缺乏兴趣。
IA的信息可从患者或照料者处获取。我们使用IA对115名受试者进行了评估,其中包括19名健康老年人、24名轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者、12名帕金森病(PD)患者和60名阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者。
内部一致性、项目可靠性和评分者间可靠性都很高。重测信度研究表明,照料者对IA问题的回答在短时间内是稳定的。同时效度研究表明,IA评估淡漠的效果与神经精神科问卷淡漠领域相当。在基于照料者的评估中,AD受试者在总体淡漠评分和缺乏兴趣维度上的得分均显著高于对照组。当根据淡漠诊断标准对AD患者进行细分时,淡漠患者的得分显著高于非淡漠患者。在基于患者的评估中,AD、MCI和对照组之间未发现差异。基于患者的评估中,仅PD组的得分高于对照组受试者。结果还表明,AD患者对自己的情感迟钝和缺乏主动性认识不足。
IA是一种可靠的方法,可用于评估痴呆和非痴呆老年受试者淡漠综合征的多个维度以及受试者对这些症状的认识。