• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调查加拿大长期护理居民中淡漠的患病率和预测因素:二次数据分析。

Investigating the Prevalence and Predictors of Apathy among the Canadian Long-Term Care Residents: A Secondary Data Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, University of Northern British Columbia, University way, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.

Alzheimer Society of Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Nurs Res. 2024 Dec;56(4):468-482. doi: 10.1177/08445621241276613. Epub 2024 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1177/08445621241276613
PMID:39195952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11528870/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In long-term care facilities (LTCF), apathy is a prevalent issue, leading to cognitive decline, functional impairment, and increased mortality risk. Despite its significance, apathy often remains underrecognized and undermanaged in these settings. Recognizing and addressing the predictors of apathy is critical for early intervention and improved care outcomes.

PURPOSE

This study aims to assess the prevalence of apathy and identify its associated risk factors among newly admitted residents in the Canadian LTCF, using the InterRAI Minimum Data Set (MDS 2.0).

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of MDS 2.0 admission assessment data between 2015 and 2019, covering 157,596 residents across six Canadian provinces and one territory. Apathy was measured using the Apathy Index of the MDS 2.0, with the biopsychosocial model guiding the analysis.

RESULTS

The prevalence of apathy was 12.5% (19,758 individuals). The most significant predictors include cognitive impairments, specific age groups, hearing impairments, vision impairments, facility size and location.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study underscore the need for tailored strategies in LTCF to address apathy, considering individual, institutional, and regional variations. Emphasis on environmental and personal factors is crucial in the management and prevention of apathy in these settings.

摘要

背景

在长期护理机构(LTCF)中,冷漠是一个普遍存在的问题,会导致认知能力下降、功能障碍和死亡风险增加。尽管冷漠问题很严重,但在这些环境中,它往往仍未得到充分识别和管理。识别和处理冷漠的预测因素对于早期干预和改善护理结果至关重要。

目的

本研究旨在使用 InterRAI 最低数据集(MDS 2.0)评估加拿大 LTCF 新入住居民中冷漠的患病率,并确定其相关危险因素。

方法

我们对 2015 年至 2019 年间的 MDS 2.0 入院评估数据进行了横断面分析,涵盖了加拿大六个省和一个地区的 157596 名居民。使用 MDS 2.0 的冷漠指数来衡量冷漠,分析以生物心理社会模型为指导。

结果

冷漠的患病率为 12.5%(19758 人)。最显著的预测因素包括认知障碍、特定年龄组、听力障碍、视力障碍、机构规模和位置。

结论

这项研究的结果强调了在 LTCF 中需要制定针对个体、机构和地区差异的策略来解决冷漠问题。在这些环境中,强调环境和个人因素对于管理和预防冷漠至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6e/11528870/29e72edb01aa/10.1177_08445621241276613-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6e/11528870/3a30cefe924f/10.1177_08445621241276613-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6e/11528870/907fabb1c545/10.1177_08445621241276613-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6e/11528870/29e72edb01aa/10.1177_08445621241276613-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6e/11528870/3a30cefe924f/10.1177_08445621241276613-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6e/11528870/907fabb1c545/10.1177_08445621241276613-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6e/11528870/29e72edb01aa/10.1177_08445621241276613-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Investigating the Prevalence and Predictors of Apathy among the Canadian Long-Term Care Residents: A Secondary Data Analysis.调查加拿大长期护理居民中淡漠的患病率和预测因素:二次数据分析。
Can J Nurs Res. 2024 Dec;56(4):468-482. doi: 10.1177/08445621241276613. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
2
Prevalence of sensory impairments in home care and long-term care using interRAI data from across Canada.使用加拿大各地的 interRAI 数据评估家庭护理和长期护理中的感觉障碍患病率。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Dec 8;22(1):944. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03671-7.
3
Agreement between administrative data and the Resident Assessment Instrument Minimum Dataset (RAI-MDS) for medication use in long-term care facilities: a population-based study.长期护理机构中行政数据与居民评估工具最小数据集(RAI-MDS)在药物使用方面的一致性:一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2015 Mar 11;15:24. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0023-2.
4
Development of the interRAI Pressure Ulcer Risk Scale (PURS) for use in long-term care and home care settings.开发用于长期护理和家庭护理环境的 interRAI 压疮风险量表(PURS)。
BMC Geriatr. 2010 Sep 20;10:67. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-10-67.
5
Clinical Complexity and Use of Antipsychotics and Restraints in Long-Term Care Residents with Parkinson's Disease.帕金森病长期护理居民中抗精神病药物和约束措施的临床复杂性及使用情况
J Parkinsons Dis. 2017;7(1):103-115. doi: 10.3233/JPD-160931.
6
Relationship between restraint use, engagement in social activity, and decline in cognitive status among residents newly admitted to long-term care facilities.长期护理机构新入院居民的约束使用、社交活动参与度与认知状态下降之间的关系。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Feb;17(2):246-255. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12707. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
7
Combined impairments in vision, hearing and cognition are associated with greater levels of functional and communication difficulties than cognitive impairment alone: Analysis of interRAI data for home care and long-term care recipients in Ontario.视力、听力和认知功能的综合损伤比单纯认知障碍与更高水平的功能和沟通困难相关:安大略省家庭护理和长期护理接受者的 interRAI 数据分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 15;13(2):e0192971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192971. eCollection 2018.
8
Cognitive decline, sensory impairment, and the use of audio-visual aids by long-term care facility residents.长期护理机构居民的认知能力下降、感觉障碍和视听辅助器具的使用。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Mar 16;22(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02895-x.
9
Depressive symptoms in long term care facilities in Western Canada: a cross sectional study.加拿大西部长期护理机构中的抑郁症状:一项横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Dec 2;19(1):335. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1298-5.
10
Resident-Level Factors Associated with Hospitalization Rates for Newly Admitted Long-Term Care Residents in Canada: A Retrospective Cohort Study.加拿大新入住长期护理机构居民住院率相关的住院医师层面因素:一项回顾性队列研究
Can J Aging. 2019 Dec;38(4):441-448. doi: 10.1017/S0714980818000715.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying and managing apathy in people with dementia living in nursing homes: a qualitative study.识别和管理住在养老院的痴呆症患者的冷漠:一项定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Nov 9;23(1):727. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04422-y.
2
Anhedonia and Depressive Disorders.快感缺失与抑郁障碍
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2023 Aug 31;21(3):401-409. doi: 10.9758/cpn.23.1086.
3
Apathy associated with antidepressant drugs: a systematic review.与抗抑郁药物相关的冷漠:一项系统评价。
Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2023 Aug;35(4):189-204. doi: 10.1017/neu.2023.6. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
4
Apathy in UK Care Home Residents with Dementia: Longitudinal Course and Determinants.英国痴呆症护理院居民的淡漠:纵向过程和决定因素。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;87(2):731-740. doi: 10.3233/JAD-215623.
5
Diagnostic criteria for apathy in neurocognitive disorders.神经认知障碍中淡漠的诊断标准。
Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Dec;17(12):1892-1904. doi: 10.1002/alz.12358. Epub 2021 May 5.
6
Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and apathy symptoms across dementia stages: A systematic review and meta-analysis.痴呆症各阶段抑郁、焦虑和淡漠症状的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021 Sep;36(9):1330-1344. doi: 10.1002/gps.5556. Epub 2021 May 4.
7
Apathy: Neurobiology, Assessment and Treatment.冷漠:神经生物学、评估与治疗
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2021 May 31;19(2):181-189. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2021.19.2.181.
8
Apathy after stroke: Diagnosis, mechanisms, consequences, and treatment.卒中后淡漠:诊断、机制、后果与治疗。
Int J Stroke. 2021 Jul;16(5):510-518. doi: 10.1177/1747493021990906. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
9
Function-Focused Person-Environment Fit for Long-Term Care Residents With Dementia: Impact on Apathy.功能导向的人与环境适配对痴呆长期护理居民的影响:对淡漠的影响。
Gerontologist. 2021 Apr 3;61(3):413-424. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa111.
10
Apathy and its impact on carer burden and psychological wellbeing in primary progressive aphasia.原发性进行性失语中的冷漠及其对照料者负担和心理健康的影响。
J Neurol Sci. 2020 Sep 15;416:117007. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.117007. Epub 2020 Jun 30.