Eberius Matthias, Mennicken Guido, Reuter Ilka, Vandenhirtz Jörg
LemnaTec GmbH, Wuerselen, Germany.
Ecotoxicology. 2002 Oct;11(5):293-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1020536702081.
Hazard assessment often needs to compare inhibition values of different test species and different test durations. But the three different methods to calculate inhibition in growth inhibition tests (final biomass, growth rate, area under the growth curve) may lead to very different and sometimes contradicting numerical sensitivities of the test species. This paper will depict why there are these different results and what consequences this has for the evaluation of results. Comprehensive discussion of different aspects will show that using growth rate may eliminate most of the problems occurring for comparisons between test species, different test times and different laboratories. The use of growth rate and the adaptation of toxicity levels maximises reproducibility, comparability and biological sensitivity of biotests.
危害评估通常需要比较不同测试物种和不同测试持续时间的抑制值。但是,生长抑制试验中计算抑制的三种不同方法(最终生物量、生长速率、生长曲线下面积)可能导致测试物种的数值敏感性差异很大,有时甚至相互矛盾。本文将阐述为何会出现这些不同的结果以及这对结果评估有何影响。对不同方面的全面讨论将表明,使用生长速率可能会消除测试物种之间、不同测试时间和不同实验室之间比较时出现的大多数问题。生长速率的使用和毒性水平的调整可最大限度地提高生物测试的可重复性、可比性和生物敏感性。