Israel Elliot, Chervinsky Paul S, Friedman Bruce, Van Bavel Julius, Skalky Carol S, Ghannam Asma F, Bird Steven R, Edelman Jonathan M
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002 Dec;110(6):847-54. doi: 10.1067/mai.2002.129413.
Maintaining asthma control is a major objective of therapy. Traditionally, the effectiveness of asthma therapy has been judged primarily by its effect on airway function rather than on multiaspect asthma control.
An inhaled corticosteroid and a leukotriene receptor antagonist were compared to determine whether they provided equivalent effects, as judged by days of asthma control.
In a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, asthmatic patients (n = 782) with FEV(1) percent predicted values of between 50% and 85% and a weekly average beta-agonist use of more than 2 puffs per day were randomized to receive montelukast (10 mg daily), beclomethasone (200 microg twice daily), or placebo treatment for 6 weeks in a double-dummy fashion. We examined the distribution of the primary end point: percentage of days of asthma control. Secondary end points included FEV(1), albuterol use, occurrence of an asthma attack, asthma flare-up, rescue corticosteroid use, sustained asthma control, and adverse experiences.
The percentage of days of asthma control was almost identical between the montelukast and beclomethasone groups (98% overlap in the distribution). Montelukast was at least equal to beclomethasone, and both were greater than placebo on the basis of frequency of asthma attacks, asthma flare-ups, and rescue corticosteroid use. Beclomethasone had a greater effect than montelukast and both treatments were better than placebo at improving FEV(1).
Montelukast was as effective as beclomethasone, as judged by indices of clinical control other than FEV(1). When evaluating the outcome of montelukast therapy, FEV(1) might underestimate clinical effectiveness.
维持哮喘控制是治疗的主要目标。传统上,哮喘治疗的有效性主要通过其对气道功能的影响来判断,而非多方面的哮喘控制情况。
比较吸入性糖皮质激素和白三烯受体拮抗剂,根据哮喘控制天数判断二者是否具有等效效果。
在一项随机、多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究中,将782例哮喘患者(预计FEV₁百分比在50%至85%之间,每周平均β受体激动剂使用量超过每日2吸)以双模拟方式随机分为接受孟鲁司特(每日10毫克)、倍氯米松(每日两次,每次200微克)或安慰剂治疗6周。我们研究了主要终点的分布情况:哮喘控制天数的百分比。次要终点包括FEV₁、沙丁胺醇使用情况、哮喘发作的发生、哮喘急性发作、急救糖皮质激素的使用、持续哮喘控制及不良事件。
孟鲁司特组和倍氯米松组哮喘控制天数的百分比几乎相同(分布重叠率为98%)。基于哮喘发作频率、哮喘急性发作及急救糖皮质激素的使用情况,孟鲁司特至少与倍氯米松等效,且二者均优于安慰剂。在改善FEV₁方面,倍氯米松的效果优于孟鲁司特,且两种治疗均优于安慰剂。
根据除FEV₁之外的临床控制指标判断,孟鲁司特与倍氯米松效果相当。在评估孟鲁司特治疗效果时,FEV₁可能会低估临床疗效。