Suppr超能文献

将研究应用于实践。职业健康护士实用指南。

Applying research to practice. Practical guidelines for occupational health nurses.

作者信息

Salazar Mary K

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

AAOHN J. 2002 Nov;50(11):520-5; quiz 526-7.

Abstract

Much has been written about the research practice gap--and there is no doubt this gap exists in occupational health nursing. It is an irony that the professionals who would benefit most from occupational health and safety research may be the ones who do not participate in or contribute to research. Closing the gap requires a commitment on the part of both practitioners and researchers. It behooves occupational health nurses to constantly seek ways to make the connection--to forge relationships that can continue to advance the specialty. Researchers must increase their efforts to conduct research in "real world" conditions, because this research is most likely to improve practice. Practitioners must be willing to familiarize themselves with research so they can become active participants in the ongoing effort to find answers to troubling occupational health and safety problems. Rosenheck (2001) presents an interesting perspective on the barriers to eliminating the research practice gap. He purports that, although professionals often are highly respectful of scientific endeavors, in reality, "daily decision making is shaped more by power structures, ingrained routines, and established resource configuration than by current scientific findings." In most organizations, standard operating procedures and behavioral norms are the major influences on workplace practices; scientific evidence plays a minor role (Rosenheck, 2001). Several reasons can be found for this lack of reliance on research as a basis for practice. Studies may demonstrate effectiveness among large groups. However, practitioners may not see the relevance or applicability of such studies to individuals or small groups of clients. Also, practitioners may fear that the implementation of new strategies will require more oversight than they are able to provide. Another logistical barrier is the application of the research may require the collaboration of multiple individuals--dynamic environments with extensive turnover may result in constant personnel changes and diminished commitments on the part of the team. Applying research to practice requires thoughtful and careful strategizing. Success depends on the commitment of key people within the organization to see the activities through from planning to implementation to evaluation. The involvement and support of management is crucial to a successful outcome. In many cases, the benefits of the research many not be readily apparent. However, if management perceives the potential value and the eventual "pay offs," they are more likely to allocate funds and other resources needed to assure the research is supported to its completion. Finding the time and resources to read and apply research in the occupational setting is a formidable task. However, the importance of a scientific base to occupational nursing practice is becoming increasingly evident. Occupational health nurses must become effective observers who recognize the value of research findings contributing to more effective practice. They must develop strategies for sharing information and for learning from others' experiences, and through this process, demystify the research process and become better research consumers. If occupational health nurses are to maximize their abilities to achieve their most important health and safety goals and to provide cost effective, quality services, they must develop strategies to enable them to use findings from relevant, well designed, practice oriented research studies.

摘要

关于研究与实践之间的差距,已有诸多著述——毫无疑问,这种差距在职业健康护理领域确实存在。具有讽刺意味的是,那些能从职业健康与安全研究中获益最多的专业人员,可能恰恰是那些不参与研究或对研究没有贡献的人。弥合这一差距需要从业者和研究者双方都做出承诺。职业健康护士理应不断寻求建立联系的方法——建立能够持续推动该专业发展的关系。研究者必须加大力度在“现实世界”条件下开展研究,因为这类研究最有可能改进实践。从业者必须愿意熟悉研究内容,以便能够积极参与到不断寻求解决棘手的职业健康与安全问题答案的努力中。罗森赫克(2001年)就消除研究与实践差距的障碍提出了一个有趣的观点。他声称,尽管专业人员通常非常尊重科学事业,但实际上,“日常决策更多地受到权力结构、根深蒂固的惯例和既定的资源配置的影响,而非当前的科学发现”。在大多数组织中,标准操作程序和行为规范是对工作场所实践的主要影响因素;科学证据所起的作用较小(罗森赫克,2001年)。对于这种缺乏将研究作为实践基础的情况,可以找到几个原因。研究可能在大群体中显示出有效性。然而,从业者可能看不到此类研究与个体或小群体客户的相关性或适用性。此外,从业者可能担心实施新策略需要的监督超出了他们所能提供的范围。另一个后勤障碍是,研究的应用可能需要多个人的协作——人员流动频繁的动态环境可能导致人员不断变动,团队的投入也会减少。将研究应用于实践需要深思熟虑和精心策划。成功取决于组织内关键人员从规划到实施再到评估全过程参与这些活动的决心。管理层的参与和支持对于取得成功的结果至关重要。在许多情况下,研究的益处可能不会立即显现。然而,如果管理层认识到其潜在价值和最终的“回报”,他们就更有可能分配确保研究得到支持直至完成所需的资金和其他资源。在职业环境中找到时间和资源来阅读和应用研究成果是一项艰巨的任务。然而,科学基础对于职业护理实践的重要性正日益明显。职业健康护士必须成为有效的观察者,认识到有助于更有效实践的研究结果的价值。他们必须制定信息共享策略以及从他人经验中学习的策略,并通过这个过程,揭开研究过程的神秘面纱,成为更好的研究成果使用者。如果职业健康护士要最大限度地发挥其能力以实现其最重要的健康与安全目标,并提供具有成本效益的优质服务,他们就必须制定策略,使自己能够运用来自相关的、精心设计的、以实践为导向的研究的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验