Chambers E C
Wash Law Rev. 1998 Apr;73(2):403-31.
The Americans with Disability Act (ADA) does not state whether it prohibits discrimination against individuals who are infected with HIV but asymptomatic. Some courts have held that the language of the ADA is unambiguous and does not cover asymptomatic HIV as a disability because the virus is not an "impairment" that substantially limits a "major life activity." Other courts have looked behind the statutory language and found that Congress intended to protect asymptomatic individuals with HIV because the virus impairs one's ability to procreate and/or engage in sexual relations. This Comment argues that asymptomatic individuals with HIV are indeed protected under the ADA, but that the analytic framework thus far employed by the courts is flawed. Asymptomatic HIV is a protected disability not because it is independently debilitating, but because the prejudices and fears of other may prevent HIV-infected persons from fully participating in society. The ADA was enacted to prevent exactly this type of discrimination.
《美国残疾人法案》(ADA)并未阐明它是否禁止对感染了艾滋病毒但无症状的个人进行歧视。一些法院认为,ADA的措辞明确,不将无症状艾滋病毒感染者视为残疾,因为该病毒并非实质性限制“主要生活活动”的“损伤”。其他法院则透过法律条文去探究,发现国会意图保护感染艾滋病毒的无症状个体,因为该病毒损害了一个人的生育能力和/或性行为能力。本评论认为,感染艾滋病毒的无症状个体确实受ADA保护,但法院迄今采用的分析框架存在缺陷。无症状艾滋病毒是受保护的残疾,并非因为它本身使人衰弱,而是因为他人的偏见和恐惧可能会阻止艾滋病毒感染者充分参与社会。ADA的制定正是为了防止这种歧视。