McNeil Jane E, Burgess Paul W
Regional Neurological Rehabilitation Unit, Homerton Hospital, London, UK.
Cortex. 2002 Sep;38(4):569-87. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70023-6.
The theoretical distinction between arithmetic facts and procedures was first made by Groen and Parkman (1972). This was confirmed with a neuropsychological single case described by Warrington (1982) who had impaired arithmetical facts but well preserved arithmetical procedures. Since this time there have been several patients described who showed a selective impairment of arithmetic facts. There have also been reports of cases with impaired arithmetical procedures. However, there has not yet been a case reported with the selective impairment of procedures in the context of intact arithmetic facts. This paper describes a patient, SR, with probable Alzheimer's dementia who had well preserved addition, multiplication and subtraction facts but who nevertheless had severe difficulties with a range of arithmetical procedures such as multidigit sums, decimals and fractions. The implications of this case for current theoretical models are discussed.
算术事实与运算程序之间的理论区别最早由格罗恩和帕克曼(1972年)提出。沃林顿(1982年)描述的一个神经心理学单病例证实了这一点,该病例算术事实受损,但运算程序保存完好。从那时起,已有数例患者被描述为存在算术事实的选择性损伤。也有关于运算程序受损病例的报告。然而,尚未有报告称在算术事实完好的情况下出现运算程序的选择性损伤。本文描述了一位可能患有阿尔茨海默病性痴呆的患者SR,其加法、乘法和减法事实保存完好,但在一系列算术运算程序(如多位数加法、小数和分数)方面仍存在严重困难。本文还讨论了该病例对当前理论模型的影响。