Suppr超能文献

对Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas Amplicor HIV-1监测超敏检测的评估:与Cobas Amplicor HIV-1监测检测(手工样本制备)的比较。

Evaluation of the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor Ultrasensitive Test: comparison with the Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor test (manual specimen preparation).

作者信息

Berger Annemarie, Scherzed Lina, Stürmer Martin, Preiser Wolfgang, Doerr Hans W, Rabenau Holger F

机构信息

Institute for Medical Virology, J. W. Goethe University Hospital, Paul Ehrlich Street 40, D-60596 Frankfurt/Main, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Virol. 2002 Dec;25 Suppl 3:S103-7. doi: 10.1016/s1386-6532(02)00185-3.

Abstract

In this preliminary study, we evaluated the performance of the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor Ultrasensitive Test (CAP; Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg, NJ) for automated specimen preparation and quantitative detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA and compared it to the Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor Ultrasensitive Test (MCA; Roche), which includes a manual sample preparation protocol. A dilution panel of a patient sample was prepared. Additionally, 584 EDTA plasma samples were collected from HIV-1 infected patients. Reproducibility was estimated with six assay runs using the dilution panel. The inter-assay coefficient of variation ranged from 39.4 to 48.4% (CAP assay) and from 34.3 to 45.6% (MCA assay), whereas the intra-assay coefficient of variation ranged from 6.2 to 58.0% (CAP assay) and from 4.4 to 57.3% (MCA assay). Comparison of CAP assay results with the HIV-1 copy number of the dilution panel determined by the MCA assay resulted in a good agreement, although the CAP results were found to be slightly lower. A significant correlation between both test systems was found when clinical samples were analyzed. The mean viral load of 152 samples, which were within the linear range of both tests, was 3.70 log(10) HIV-1 copies/ml by the CAP assay compared to 3.73 by the MCA assay. In conclusion, we could demonstrate that the new Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas Amplicor HIV Monitor Ultrasensitive Test is reproducible and sensitive. In comparison to the assay with manual extraction, no significant difference in HIV-1 RNA copy numbers was observed.

摘要

在这项初步研究中,我们评估了Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor超敏检测法(CAP;罗氏分子系统公司,新泽西州布兰奇堡)在自动样本制备及定量检测1型人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV-1)RNA方面的性能,并将其与包含手工样本制备方案的Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor超敏检测法(MCA;罗氏)进行比较。制备了一份患者样本的稀释样本组。此外,还从HIV-1感染患者中收集了584份乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)血浆样本。使用稀释样本组通过六次检测运行评估了重复性。批间变异系数在39.4%至48.4%(CAP检测法)和34.3%至45.6%(MCA检测法)之间,而批内变异系数在6.2%至58.0%(CAP检测法)和4.4%至57.3%(MCA检测法)之间。将CAP检测法的结果与通过MCA检测法确定的稀释样本组的HIV-1拷贝数进行比较,结果显示一致性良好,不过发现CAP结果略低。在分析临床样本时,发现两种检测系统之间存在显著相关性。在两种检测的线性范围内的152份样本,其平均病毒载量通过CAP检测法为3.70 log(10) HIV-1拷贝/毫升,而通过MCA检测法为3.73。总之,我们可以证明新的Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas Amplicor HIV监测超敏检测法具有可重复性和敏感性。与手工提取检测法相比,未观察到HIV-1 RNA拷贝数有显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验