• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of carotid arteries: utility in routine clinical practice.

作者信息

Johnston Dean C C, Eastwood James D, Nguyen Thanh, Goldstein Larry B

机构信息

Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of British Columbia, Center for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Stroke. 2002 Dec;33(12):2834-8. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000043632.51378.24.

DOI:10.1161/01.str.0000043632.51378.24
PMID:12468778
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CEMRA) is among the newer noninvasive tests used for the evaluation of patients with carotid artery disease. Evidence supporting its utility in routine clinical practice is lacking.

METHODS

The results of CEMRA were compared with those of catheter angiography in 50 consecutive patients being evaluated for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) at a community hospital. Using indications for CEA based on published guidelines, we determined the rate of misclassification for surgery, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. In addition, the interrater agreement (kappa score) of CEMRA was compared with that of catheter angiography in the studied population and with interpretations provided by 2 blinded radiologists.

RESULTS

Compared with catheter angiography, 24% (95% CI, 12% to 36%) of patients would have been misclassified for CEA on the basis of CEMRA results alone. CEMRA was associated with sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 62%, positive predictive value of 78%, and negative predictive value of 89%. When both CEMRA and duplex Doppler ultrasound were performed and the results were concordant, the misclassification rate decreased to 17% (95% CI, 2% to 32%). kappa scores were similar for CEMRA and catheter angiography (0.72 and 0.75, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

CEMRA was found to be highly sensitive for detection of surgically amenable carotid stenosis. kappa scores for the interpretation of CEMRA and catheter angiography were similar. However, clinicians should be cautious when using CEMRA alone for surgical decision making in CEA candidates because a significant number of patients may be misclassified. The rate of misclassification is reduced when the results of CEMRA and duplex Doppler ultrasound are concordant.

摘要

相似文献

1
Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of carotid arteries: utility in routine clinical practice.
Stroke. 2002 Dec;33(12):2834-8. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000043632.51378.24.
2
Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the cervical vessels: experience with 422 patients.颈部血管对比增强磁共振血管造影:422例患者的经验
Stroke. 2001 Oct;32(10):2282-6. doi: 10.1161/hs1001.096046.
3
Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of atherosclerotic internal carotid stenosis as the noninvasive imaging modality in revascularization decision making.作为血管重建决策中无创成像方式的对比增强三维磁共振血管造影术用于评估动脉粥样硬化性颈内动脉狭窄
Stroke. 2003 Mar;34(3):660-4. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000057462.02141.6F. Epub 2003 Feb 20.
4
Contrast-enhanced MR angiography for carotid disease: diagnostic and potential clinical impact.用于颈动脉疾病的对比增强磁共振血管造影:诊断及潜在临床影响
Neurology. 2004 Apr 27;62(8):1282-90. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000123697.89371.8d.
5
Concordance rate differences of 3 noninvasive imaging techniques to measure carotid stenosis in clinical routine practice: results of the CARMEDAS multicenter study.临床常规实践中3种无创成像技术测量颈动脉狭窄的一致性率差异:CARMEDAS多中心研究结果
Stroke. 2004 Mar;35(3):682-6. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000117251.65222.DA. Epub 2004 Feb 5.
6
Nonenhanced hybridized arterial spin labeled magnetic resonance angiography of the extracranial carotid arteries using a fast low angle shot readout at 3 Tesla.在3特斯拉磁场下,使用快速低角度激发读出序列的非增强杂交动脉自旋标记磁共振血管造影术用于颅外颈动脉成像。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016 Apr 12;18:18. doi: 10.1186/s12968-016-0238-1.
7
Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision making: noninvasive vascular imaging versus angiography.临床颈动脉内膜切除术的决策制定:非侵入性血管成像与血管造影术的比较
Neurology. 2001 Apr 24;56(8):1009-15. doi: 10.1212/wnl.56.8.1009.
8
Measuring carotid stenosis on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: diagnostic performance and reproducibility of 3 different methods.在对比增强磁共振血管造影上测量颈动脉狭窄:3种不同方法的诊断性能及可重复性
Stroke. 2004 Sep;35(9):2083-8. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000136722.30008.b1. Epub 2004 Jul 8.
9
Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies prior to carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术之前诊断策略的成本效益
Ann Neurol. 2005 Oct;58(4):506-15. doi: 10.1002/ana.20591.
10
Surgical decision making for carotid endarterectomy and contemporary magnetic resonance angiography.
Am J Surg. 1999 Sep;178(3):182-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)00141-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Indications for carotid artery surgery and stent: the role of carotid ultrasound.颈动脉手术和支架置入的适应症:颈动脉超声的作用。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2008 Feb;10(1):17-24. doi: 10.1007/s11886-008-0005-5.
2
Dynamic spin labeling angiography in extracranial carotid artery stenosis.颅外颈动脉狭窄的动态自旋标记血管造影术。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 May;26(5):1035-43.
3
Combined use of color duplex ultrasonography and B-flow imaging for evaluation of patients with carotid artery stenosis.彩色双功超声与B-flow成像联合应用于颈动脉狭窄患者的评估
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004 Nov-Dec;25(10):1856-60.
4
Evaluation of carotid stenosis with axial high-resolution black-blood MR imaging.采用轴向高分辨率黑血磁共振成像评估颈动脉狭窄。
Eur Radiol. 2004 Jul;14(7):1154-61. doi: 10.1007/s00330-004-2245-0. Epub 2004 Mar 6.
5
Imaging of carotid artery disease: from luminology to function?颈动脉疾病的影像学检查:从管腔学走向功能学?
Neuroradiology. 2003 Oct;45(10):671-80. doi: 10.1007/s00234-003-1054-5. Epub 2003 Sep 4.