Suppr超能文献

不同种植方式下溴化物和农药向瓦管排水系统的优先迁移

Preferential bromide and pesticide movement to tile drains under different cropping practices.

作者信息

Fortin J, Gagnon-Bertrand E, Vézina L, Rompré M

机构信息

Département des sols et de génie agroalimentaire, Pavillon Paul-Comtois, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada G1K 7P4.

出版信息

J Environ Qual. 2002 Nov-Dec;31(6):1940-52. doi: 10.2134/jeq2002.1940.

Abstract

Subsurface drainage systems are useful tools to study chemical leaching in soils. Our objective was to compare the breakthrough behavior of bromide, atrazine (2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-isopropylamino-s-triazine) and metolachlor [2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl) acetamid] to tile drains under two fall tillage practices (conventional tillage [CT] with a moldboard plow, and reduced tillage [RT] with a chisel plow) in field plots cultivated with corn (Zea mays L.). Leachate volume were greater in RT than in CT, with no statistical differences. Soil analysis showed that bromide migrated deeper in the soil profile than both herbicides, with little tillage effect. All chemicals were detected in drainage water at the same time and followed an event-driven behavior. Tillage had no effect on atrazine and metolachlor found in drainage water, while bromide concentration peaks were higher in RT than in CT in 1999. Concentration peaks were recorded earlier for atrazine and metolachlor than for bromide. Plots of cumulative relative chemical mass (cumulative mass divided by total mass measured in drainage) as a function of cumulative drainage were mostly linear for bromide, while they were S-shaped for both herbicides. Drainage that corresponded to 50% of relative cumulative mass ranged from 40 to 55% for bromide and from 5 to 28% for both herbicides. Rapid chemical movement to tile drains suggested that preferential flow was important in both CT and RT, and that these tillage practices had little influence on this phenomena.

摘要

地下排水系统是研究土壤中化学物质淋溶的有用工具。我们的目标是比较在种植玉米(Zea mays L.)的田间地块上,在两种秋季耕作方式(用铧式犁进行的传统耕作[CT]和用凿式犁进行的少耕[RT])下,溴化物、阿特拉津(2-氯-4-乙氨基-6-异丙氨基-s-三嗪)和异丙甲草胺[2-氯-N-(2-乙基-6-甲基苯基)-N-(2-甲氧基-1-甲基乙基)乙酰胺]向排水瓦管的穿透行为。少耕处理的渗滤液体积大于传统耕作处理,但无统计学差异。土壤分析表明,溴化物在土壤剖面中的迁移深度比两种除草剂都深,耕作影响较小。所有化学物质在排水水中同时被检测到,且呈现事件驱动的行为。耕作对排水水中的阿特拉津和异丙甲草胺没有影响,而1999年少耕处理中溴化物的浓度峰值高于传统耕作处理。阿特拉津和异丙甲草胺的浓度峰值出现时间早于溴化物。溴化物的累积相对化学质量(累积质量除以排水中测得的总质量)与累积排水量的关系图大多呈线性,而两种除草剂的关系图呈S形。对应于相对累积质量50%的排水量,溴化物为40%至55%,两种除草剂为5%至28%。化学物质快速向排水瓦管移动表明,优先流在传统耕作和少耕处理中都很重要,且这些耕作方式对这一现象影响较小。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验