• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

耕作引起的土壤再分布对农药随后向地下排水沟迁移的影响。

Effects of soil redistribution by tillage on subsequent transport of pesticide to subsurface drains.

机构信息

Department of Environment & Geography, University of York, York, UK.

Syngenta, Jealott's Hill International Research Centre, Bracknell, UK.

出版信息

Pest Manag Sci. 2023 Feb;79(2):616-626. doi: 10.1002/ps.7229. Epub 2022 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1002/ps.7229
PMID:36214812
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10092331/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tillage operations will change the distribution in soil for any pesticide residues still present from earlier applications. This redistributive effect of tillage has been neglected in the study of pesticide leaching behavior. This study reviews the literature to characterize this redistributive effect for different tillage operations and uses a pesticide leaching model to investigate the impact of redistribution on pesticide transport to subsurface drains which is a significant input route to surface water bodies.

RESULTS

Inversion ploughing moves the majority of any residues of pesticide present at or near the soil surface into the bottom two-thirds of the plough layer, whereas non-inversion ploughing has only a limited redistributive effect. Incorporating this redistributive effect into model simulations resulted in large changes (typically 5-10-fold difference) in both the maximum concentration and total mass of pesticide transported to drains over the winter following cultivation. More intense cultivation decreased subsequent leaching for relatively mobile compounds (Koc ≤1000 mL g ), but increased it for strongly sorbed pesticides (Koc ≥2000 mL g ).

CONCLUSION

The redistributive effect of soil tillage on pesticide residues can have a large effect on subsequent transport to subsurface drains. This effect has been neglected in the literature. Field research is required to validate the model simulations presented here, and consideration should be given as to whether the effect needs to be included within risk assessment procedures. © 2022 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

摘要

背景

耕作操作会改变土壤中任何先前施用的农药残留的分布。这种耕作的再分配效应在研究农药淋溶行为时被忽视了。本研究综述了文献,以描述不同耕作操作的这种再分配效应,并使用农药淋溶模型来研究再分配对向地下排水沟输送农药的影响,这是地表水体的一个重要输入途径。

结果

翻耕将大部分存在于土壤表面或附近的农药残留转移到底部 2/3 的耕层中,而不翻耕的再分配效应有限。将这种再分配效应纳入模型模拟中,导致在耕作后冬季向排水沟输送的农药最大浓度和总质量发生了很大变化(通常差异为 5-10 倍)。更剧烈的耕作会减少相对移动化合物(Koc≤1000ml/g)的后续淋溶,但会增加强吸附农药(Koc≥2000ml/g)的淋溶。

结论

土壤耕作对农药残留的再分配效应会对随后向地下排水沟的输送产生很大影响。这一效应在文献中被忽视了。需要进行田间研究来验证这里提出的模型模拟,并且应该考虑是否需要将这一效应纳入风险评估程序。©2022 作者。Pest Management Science 由 John Wiley & Sons Ltd 代表化学工业协会出版。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e51/10092331/0854dc515d82/PS-79-616-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e51/10092331/071fcba06fdb/PS-79-616-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e51/10092331/6e7a92856740/PS-79-616-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e51/10092331/31f863b995ee/PS-79-616-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e51/10092331/0854dc515d82/PS-79-616-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e51/10092331/071fcba06fdb/PS-79-616-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e51/10092331/6e7a92856740/PS-79-616-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e51/10092331/31f863b995ee/PS-79-616-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e51/10092331/0854dc515d82/PS-79-616-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of soil redistribution by tillage on subsequent transport of pesticide to subsurface drains.耕作引起的土壤再分布对农药随后向地下排水沟迁移的影响。
Pest Manag Sci. 2023 Feb;79(2):616-626. doi: 10.1002/ps.7229. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
2
Pesticide fate modelling in conservation tillage: Simulating the effect of mulch and cover crop on S-metolachlor leaching.在保护性耕作中农药的归宿建模:模拟覆盖物和覆盖作物对甲磺胺草醚淋溶的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jul 1;628-629:1508-1517. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.144. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
3
Soil column leaching of pesticides.土壤柱淋洗农药。
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2013;221:1-105. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4448-0_1.
4
Identification of key climatic factors regulating the transport of pesticides in leaching and to tile drains.确定调节农药在淋溶过程中以及进入排水瓦管迁移的关键气候因素。
Pest Manag Sci. 2008 Sep;64(9):933-44. doi: 10.1002/ps.1587.
5
Modelling of the long-term fate of pesticide residues in agricultural soils and their surface exchange with the atmosphere: Part II. Projected long-term fate of pesticide residues.农业土壤中农药残留的长期归宿及其与大气的表面交换建模:第二部分。农药残留的预测长期归宿。
Sci Total Environ. 2007 May 1;377(1):61-80. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.01.084. Epub 2007 Mar 8.
6
Pesticide distribution in an agricultural environment in Argentina.阿根廷农业环境中的农药分布。
J Environ Sci Health B. 2011;46(8):662-70. doi: 10.1080/03601234.2012.592051.
7
Sensitivity analysis of the STICS-MACRO model to identify cropping practices reducing pesticides losses.对 STICS-MACRO 模型进行敏感性分析,以确定减少农药损失的种植方式。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Feb 15;580:117-129. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.010. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
8
Tillage impact on herbicide loss by surface runoff and lateral subsurface flow.耕作对地表径流和侧向地下径流中除草剂损失的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Oct 15;530-531:357-366. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.079. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
9
A meta-analysis of pesticide loss in runoff under conventional tillage and no-till management.传统耕作和免耕管理下径流中农药流失的荟萃分析。
Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Jan 12;190(2):79. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-6441-1.
10
Effects of over-winter green cover on soil solution nitrate concentrations beneath tillage land.冬小麦秸秆覆盖对耕地土壤硝态氮淋溶的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2014 Feb 1;470-471:967-74. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.10.057. Epub 2013 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Saline-Alkaline Soil and Ryegrass Growth with Coal Gangue Treatments.利用煤矸石处理改良盐碱土及黑麦草生长情况
Plants (Basel). 2024 Dec 5;13(23):3419. doi: 10.3390/plants13233419.

本文引用的文献

1
Stochastic modeling of diffuse pesticide losses from a small agricultural catchment.小型农业集水区农药扩散损失的随机模型
J Environ Qual. 2005 Jun 7;34(4):1174-85. doi: 10.2134/jeq2004.0044. Print 2005 Jul-Aug.
2
Exposure to sulfosulfuron in agricultural drainage ditches: field monitoring and scenario-based modelling.农业排水渠中磺酰磺隆的暴露:实地监测与情景建模
Pest Manag Sci. 2004 Aug;60(8):765-76. doi: 10.1002/ps.876.
3
Preferential bromide and pesticide movement to tile drains under different cropping practices.不同种植方式下溴化物和农药向瓦管排水系统的优先迁移
J Environ Qual. 2002 Nov-Dec;31(6):1940-52. doi: 10.2134/jeq2002.1940.
4
Tillage, intercrop, and controlled drainage-subirrigation influence atrazine, metribuzin, and metolachlor loss.耕作、间作以及控制排水-次灌溉对莠去津、嗪草酮和异丙甲草胺的流失有影响。
J Environ Qual. 2001 Mar-Apr;30(2):561-72. doi: 10.2134/jeq2001.302561x.