de Laet Chris E D H, van der Klift Marjolein, Hofman Albert, Pols Huibert A P
Institute for Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Bone Miner Res. 2002 Dec;17(12):2231-6. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.12.2231.
In postmenopausal women, the T score for bone mineral density (BMD) is a well-accepted diagnostic criterion for osteoporosis. It is also used to assess fracture risk. However, it is unclear whether in elderly men similar BMD thresholds should be used. Different hypotheses have been proposed for the relation of BMD with hip fracture risk in men. In this study, we tested those hypotheses using a mathematical model and we compared the calculated results with observed prospective data from the Rotterdam study. In the model, we combined the observed femoral neck BMD distribution for men and women with previously derived hip fracture risk functions based on age and BMD. For men, we tested different hypotheses for the relation of BMD with hip fracture risk. The relation of BMD with hip fracture risk is similar in men and women (scenario 1) or the relative risk (RR) per standard deviation (SD) decrease of BMD is either larger or smaller in men than in women (scenario 2a and 2b), or, at a similar absolute fracture risk, men have a higher BMD (scenario 3). In the prospective data, men with a hip fracture had an average BMD that was 0.070 g/cm2 higher than women with a hip fracture. The calculated results from the first scenario were consistent with those data and were also consistent with the observed hip fracture incidence and the observed female-to-male (F/M) risk ratio (1.7). When the RR for each SD decrease of BMD was assumed to be either larger or smaller in men than in women (second scenario), the calculated average BMD difference in men and women became respectively smaller or larger than observed. When men would have a higher fracture risk at similar BMD levels (third scenario), the calculated total number of hip fractures increased and even exceeded that in women, with an F/M risk ratio of 0.94 in our example. In women, a larger proportion of hip fractures occurs at a T score below -2.5 than in men using the same absolute BMD threshold, but using a male-specific T score largely solves this diagnostic problem. Taken together, the average hip fracture risk in men is much lower than in women but appeared to be similar at the same BMD. Therefore, we propose the use of the same absolute BMD thresholds for decisions about interventions.
在绝经后女性中,骨密度(BMD)的T值是广泛认可的骨质疏松症诊断标准。它也用于评估骨折风险。然而,目前尚不清楚在老年男性中是否应使用类似的BMD阈值。关于男性BMD与髋部骨折风险的关系,已经提出了不同的假设。在本研究中,我们使用数学模型对这些假设进行了检验,并将计算结果与来自鹿特丹研究的观察性前瞻性数据进行了比较。在模型中,我们将观察到的男性和女性股骨颈BMD分布与先前基于年龄和BMD得出的髋部骨折风险函数相结合。对于男性,我们检验了BMD与髋部骨折风险关系的不同假设。BMD与髋部骨折风险的关系在男性和女性中相似(情景1),或者男性中BMD每降低一个标准差(SD)的相对风险(RR)比女性大或小(情景2a和2b),或者在相似的绝对骨折风险下,男性的BMD更高(情景3)。在前瞻性数据中,髋部骨折男性的平均BMD比髋部骨折女性高0.070 g/cm²。第一种情景的计算结果与这些数据一致,也与观察到的髋部骨折发病率以及观察到的女性与男性(F/M)风险比(1.7)一致。当假设男性中BMD每降低一个SD的RR比女性大或小(第二种情景)时,计算得出的男性和女性平均BMD差异分别变得比观察值小或大。当男性在相似的BMD水平下具有更高的骨折风险(第三种情景)时,计算得出的髋部骨折总数增加,甚至超过女性,在我们的例子中F/M风险比为0.94。在女性中,使用相同的绝对BMD阈值时,T值低于-2.5的髋部骨折比例比男性大,但使用男性特定的T值在很大程度上解决了这个诊断问题。综上所述,男性的平均髋部骨折风险远低于女性,但在相同的BMD水平下似乎相似。因此,我们建议使用相同的绝对BMD阈值来决定干预措施。