De Laet C E, Van Hout B A, Burger H, Weel A E, Hofman A, Pols H A
Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Erasmus University Medical School, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Bone Miner Res. 1998 Oct;13(10):1587-93. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.10.1587.
The aim of our study was to validate a hip fracture risk function, composed of age and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD). This estimate of the 1-year cumulative risk was previously developed on the basis of Dutch hip fracture incidence data and BMD in men and women. A cohort of 7046 persons (2778 men) aged 55 years and over was followed for an average of 3.8 years. The 1-year hip fracture risk estimate was calculated for each participant according to the risk function and categorized as low (<0.1%), moderate (0.1 to < 1%), or high (> or =1%). Observed first hip fracture incidence was then analyzed for each of these risk categories by age and gender. Additionally, we calculated the relative risk per standard deviation (SD) decrease in femoral neck BMD in this population. At baseline, 2360 individuals were categorized as low risk, 2567 as moderate risk, and 378 as high risk During follow-up, 110 first hip fractures were observed corresponding to an incidence rate of 4.1/1000 person-years (pyrs) (95% confidence interval 3.4-5.0). The observed incidence rate in the low risk group was 0.2/1000 pyrs (0.1-0.9), 2.7/1000 pyrs (1.8-3.9) in the moderate risk group, and 18.4/1000 pyrs (12.4-27.2) in the high risk group. Below the age of 70 years, incidence was low in all categories, and very few individuals were considered at high risk Above the age of 70 years, the observed incidence was high in the high risk group, while in the low and moderate risk groups, the incidence remained low even over 80 years of age. In women, the age-adjusted relative risk for hip fractures was 2.5 per SD decrease in femoral neck BMD (1.8-3.6), while in men this relative risk was 3.0 per SD (1.7-5.4). In conclusion, we observed a similar relation of hip fracture with femoral neck BMD in men and women and were able to predict accurately hip fracture rates over a period of almost 4 years.
我们研究的目的是验证一种由年龄和股骨颈骨密度(BMD)组成的髋部骨折风险函数。这种1年累积风险的估计值先前是根据荷兰男性和女性的髋部骨折发病率数据及骨密度得出的。对7046名年龄在55岁及以上的人群(2778名男性)进行了平均3.8年的随访。根据风险函数为每位参与者计算1年髋部骨折风险估计值,并将其分为低风险(<0.1%)、中度风险(0.1%至<1%)或高风险(≥1%)。然后按年龄和性别对这些风险类别中的每一类观察到的首次髋部骨折发病率进行分析。此外,我们计算了该人群中股骨颈骨密度每降低一个标准差(SD)的相对风险。在基线时,2360人被归类为低风险,2567人为中度风险,378人为高风险。在随访期间,观察到110例首次髋部骨折,发病率为4.1/1000人年(pyrs)(95%置信区间3.4 - 5.0)。低风险组的观察发病率为0.2/1000 pyrs(0.1 - 0.9),中度风险组为2.7/1000 pyrs(1.8 - 3.9),高风险组为18.4/1000 pyrs(12.4 - 27.2)。在70岁以下,所有类别中的发病率都很低,很少有人被认为是高风险。70岁以上,高风险组的观察发病率很高,而在低风险和中度风险组中,即使到80岁以上发病率仍很低。在女性中,股骨颈骨密度每降低一个标准差,髋部骨折的年龄调整相对风险为2.5(1.8 - 3.6),而在男性中,这种相对风险为每标准差3.0(1.7 - 5.4)。总之,我们观察到男性和女性髋部骨折与股骨颈骨密度之间的关系相似,并且能够在近4年的时间里准确预测髋部骨折发生率。