Catalano Richard F, Hawkins J David, Berglund M Lisa, Pollard John A, Arthur Michael W
Social Development Research Group, School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98115, USA.
J Adolesc Health. 2002 Dec;31(6 Suppl):230-9. doi: 10.1016/s1054-139x(02)00496-2.
To examine the convergence in the critiques and recommendations for the future of programs to promote healthy development and prevent problem behaviors among children and adolescents.
A review of literature captures two streams of thought, those promoting positive youth development approaches to youth programming and those promoting prevention science approaches to youth programming.
Results suggest that advocates of positive youth development and prevention science have similar critiques of single-problem-focused prevention programs in the 1980s and early 1990s, and have similar recommendations for the future of youth programming. Further, review of data on youth development suggests that it is important to focus on risk and protection in preventing adolescent problems as well as in promoting positive youth development.
These results suggest that both youth development and prevention science approaches have grown from similar roots and make similar recommendations for the future of youth programming. Further, data on precursors suggest that focusing on promoting protection and reducing risk is likely to prevent problems and promote positive youth development. Yet advocates of these approaches often are at odds, suggesting that the approaches provide different paradigmatic approaches to youth programming. We conclude that cooperation between these two approaches would further progress in the field of youth programming.
探讨关于促进儿童和青少年健康发展及预防问题行为项目未来的批评意见和建议的趋同性。
文献综述涵盖了两种思想流派，即那些提倡采用积极青少年发展方法进行青少年项目规划的流派，以及那些提倡采用预防科学方法进行青少年项目规划的流派。
结果表明，积极青少年发展和预防科学的倡导者对20世纪80年代和90年代初以单一问题为重点的预防项目有类似的批评意见，并且对青少年项目的未来有类似的建议。此外，对青少年发展数据的综述表明，在预防青少年问题以及促进积极的青少年发展方面，关注风险和保护都很重要。
这些结果表明，青少年发展和预防科学方法都源于相似的根基，并且对青少年项目的未来提出了类似的建议。此外，关于先兆的数据表明，关注促进保护和降低风险可能预防问题并促进积极的青少年发展。然而，这些方法的倡导者常常存在分歧，这表明这些方法为青少年项目规划提供了不同的范式方法。我们得出结论，这两种方法之间的合作将推动青少年项目规划领域的进一步发展。
