Miya Masaki, Takeshima Hirohiko, Endo Hiromitsu, Ishiguro Naoya B, Inoue Jun G, Mukai Takahiko, Satoh Takashi P, Yamaguchi Motoomi, Kawaguchi Akira, Mabuchi Kohji, Shirai Shigeru M, Nishida Mutsumi
Department of Zoology, Natural History Museum & Institute, Chiba, 955-2 Aoba-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8682, Japan.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003 Jan;26(1):121-38. doi: 10.1016/s1055-7903(02)00332-9.
A recent preliminary study using complete mitochondrial DNA sequences from 48 species of teleosts has suggested that higher teleostean phylogenies should be reinvestigated on the basis of more intensive taxonomic sampling. As a second step towards the resolution of higher teleostean phylogenies, which have been described as the "(unresolved) bush at the top of the tree," we reanalyzed their relationships using mitogenomic data from 100 purposefully chosen species that fully represented all of the higher teleostean orders, except for the Batrachoidiformes. Unweighted and weighted maximum parsimony analyses were conducted with the data set that comprised concatenated nucleotide sequences from 12 protein-coding genes (excluding 3rd codon positions) and 21 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes (stem regions only) from each species. The resultant trees were well resolved and largely congruent, with most internal branches being supported by high statistical values. All major, comprehensive groups above ordinal level as currently defined in higher teleosts (with the exception of the Neoteleostei and several monotypic groups), such as the Eurypterygii, Ctenosquamata, Acanthomorpha, Paracanthopterygii, Acanthopterygii, and Percomorpha, appeared to be nonmonophyletic in the present tree. Such incongruities largely resulted from differences in the placement and/or limits of the orders Ateleopodiformes, Lampridiformes, Polymixiiformes, Ophidiiformes, Lophiiformes, Beryciformes, Stephanoberyciformes, and Zeiformes, long-standing problematic taxa in systematic ichthyology. Of these, the resulting phylogenetic positions of the Ophidiiformes and Lophiiformes were totally unexpected, because, although they have consistently been considered relatively primitive groups within higher teleosts (Paracanthopterygii), they were confidently placed within a crown group of teleosts, herein called the Percomorpha. It should be noted that many unexpected, but highly supported relationships were found within the Percomorpha, being highly promising for the next investigative step towards resolution of this remarkably diversified group of teleosts.
最近一项对48种硬骨鱼完整线粒体DNA序列的初步研究表明,应基于更密集的分类取样对硬骨鱼更高层次的系统发育进行重新研究。作为解决被描述为“树顶(未解决的)灌木丛”的硬骨鱼更高层次系统发育问题的第二步,我们使用了来自100个经过精心挑选的物种的线粒体基因组数据重新分析了它们之间的关系,这些物种充分代表了除蟾鱼目之外的所有硬骨鱼更高层次的目。对包含每个物种12个蛋白质编码基因(不包括第三密码子位置)和21个转运RNA(tRNA)基因(仅茎区)的串联核苷酸序列的数据集进行了非加权和加权最大简约分析。得到的树状图得到了很好的解析,并且在很大程度上是一致的,大多数内部分支都得到了较高统计值的支持。目前在硬骨鱼中定义的高于目级别的所有主要综合类群(新真骨鱼和几个单型类群除外),如广鳍类、栉鳞类、棘鳍类、副棘鳍类、棘鳍类和鲈形类,在当前的树状图中似乎都不是单系的。这种不一致主要是由于无鳍鱼目、月鱼目、多鳍鱼目、鼬鳚目、鮟鱇目、金眼鲷目、冠鲷目和海鲂目的位置和/或范围的差异造成的,这些都是鱼类系统学中长期存在问题的分类单元。其中,鼬鳚目和鮟鱇目的系统发育位置完全出乎意料,因为尽管它们一直被认为是硬骨鱼(副棘鳍类)中相对原始的类群,但它们被可靠地置于硬骨鱼的一个冠群中,在此称为鲈形类。应该注意的是,在鲈形类中发现了许多意想不到但得到高度支持的关系,这对于下一步解决这个极其多样化的硬骨鱼类群的研究极具前景。