Sink J D, Comer P B, James P M, Loveland S R
Ann Surg. 1976 Jan;183(1):58-61. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197601000-00012.
Venous air embolism is a potential complication of many surgical, therapeutic, and diagnostic procedures. Aspiration of air via a catheter placed in the superior vena cava or right atrium or placed in the pulmonary outflow tract and pulled through the right heart chambers had been advocated for the treatment of venous air embolism. In this study, three catheter positions were analyzed to determine which was best for removal of gas after induction of massive venous air embolism in dogs. In 18 dogs, 9 of which were suspended by their forelegs to simulate the sitting position used in posterior fossa exploration and 9 of which were supine, a Swan-Ganz catheter was placed in the right atrium, right ventricle, or pulmonary artery. A measured amount of air was injected into the left jugular vein and syringe aspiration of the air was attempted through the catheter. In the group with the catheter in the pulmonary artery, aspiration was continuous while the catheter was withdrawn through the right heart chambers. The amount of air aspirated varied widely among the three catheter positions, and no one catheter position proved superior to the other two.
静脉空气栓塞是许多外科手术、治疗和诊断操作中潜在的并发症。通过置于上腔静脉或右心房或置于肺流出道并经右心腔拉出的导管抽吸空气,一直被提倡用于治疗静脉空气栓塞。在本研究中,分析了三种导管位置,以确定在犬诱发大量静脉空气栓塞后哪种位置最有利于气体排出。18只犬,其中9只前肢悬吊以模拟后颅窝探查时使用的坐位,9只仰卧位,将一根 Swan-Ganz 导管置于右心房、右心室或肺动脉。向左侧颈静脉注入一定量的空气,并尝试通过导管用注射器抽吸空气。在导管位于肺动脉的组中,当导管经右心腔抽出时持续抽吸。三种导管位置抽吸的空气量差异很大,没有一种导管位置被证明优于其他两种。