• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

市中心区健康研究面临的方法学、实践和伦理挑战。

Methodological, practical, and ethical challenges to inner-city health research.

作者信息

Bayoumi Ahmed M, Hwang Stephen W

机构信息

Inner City Health Research Unit, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

J Urban Health. 2002 Dec;79(4 Suppl 1):S35-42. doi: 10.1093/jurban/79.suppl_1.s35.

DOI:10.1093/jurban/79.suppl_1.s35
PMID:12473697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3456617/
Abstract

Inner-city health research can be challenging because it deals with vulnerable populations and sometimes puts investigators in difficult situations. Some challenges are methodological, including selecting the optimal research design, implementing effective methods of recruitment and retention, and determining the best approach to data analysis. Other issues are practical, including addressing potential biases in social research; dealing with conflicting research agendas among investigators, community agencies, and funding agencies; and disseminating research findings effectively. Another set of issues relates to the ethical conduct of research, including ensuring privacy, maintaining confidentiality, and obtaining consent that is informed, not coerced, and not influenced by undue inducements. Throughout the research endeavor, the inner-city health researcher must carefully balance the roles of investigator, advocate, activist, and caregiver.

摘要

城市中心区健康研究可能具有挑战性,因为它涉及弱势群体,有时会使研究人员陷入困境。一些挑战是方法学上的,包括选择最佳研究设计、实施有效的招募和留用方法,以及确定最佳数据分析方法。其他问题则是实际操作方面的,包括解决社会研究中的潜在偏差;处理研究人员、社区机构和资助机构之间相互冲突的研究议程;以及有效地传播研究结果。另一类问题与研究的道德行为有关,包括确保隐私、保密,以及获得知情、非强制且不受不当引诱影响的同意。在整个研究过程中,城市中心区健康研究人员必须仔细平衡研究者、倡导者、活动家及照顾者的角色。

相似文献

1
Methodological, practical, and ethical challenges to inner-city health research.市中心区健康研究面临的方法学、实践和伦理挑战。
J Urban Health. 2002 Dec;79(4 Suppl 1):S35-42. doi: 10.1093/jurban/79.suppl_1.s35.
2
Confidentiality in participatory research: Challenges from one study.参与式研究中的保密性:一项研究带来的挑战
Nurs Ethics. 2016 Jun;23(4):442-54. doi: 10.1177/0969733014564909. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
3
Anticipated Ethics and Regulatory Challenges in PCORnet: The National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network.PCORnet(全国以患者为中心的临床研究网络)中预期的伦理和监管挑战
Account Res. 2016;23(2):79-96. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2015.1023951.
4
The urgent need for ethical guidelines to protect children in the dissemination of research findings.在研究结果传播过程中,迫切需要道德准则来保护儿童。
Child Abuse Negl. 2012 Nov-Dec;36(11-12):798-9. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Nov 10.
5
Ethical aspects of data sharing and research participant protections.数据共享和研究参与者保护的伦理方面。
Am Psychol. 2018 Feb-Mar;73(2):138-145. doi: 10.1037/amp0000240.
6
Research ethics, informed consent, and participant recruitment.研究伦理、知情同意与参与者招募。
Clin Nurse Spec. 2004 Mar-Apr;18(2):88-95; quiz 96-7. doi: 10.1097/00002800-200403000-00014.
7
Using Social Media as a Research Recruitment Tool: Ethical Issues and Recommendations.利用社交媒体作为研究招募工具:伦理问题与建议。
Am J Bioeth. 2017 Mar;17(3):3-14. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1276644.
8
Best practice & research in anaesthesiology issue on new approaches in clinical research ethics in clinical research.《麻醉学最佳实践与研究》临床研究伦理新方法专刊。
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Dec;25(4):569-82. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2011.08.003.
9
Timing invitations to participate in clinical research: preliminary versus informed consent.邀请参与临床研究的时机:初步同意与知情同意
J Med Philos. 2005 Feb;30(1):89-106. doi: 10.1080/03605310590907075.
10
Ethical issues in using the internet to engage participants in family and child research: A scoping review.利用互联网吸引家庭和儿童研究参与者的伦理问题:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 27;13(9):e0204572. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204572. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Fathers Know Best: Inner-City African American Fathers' Perceptions Regarding Their Involvement in the Pediatric Medical Home.父亲最了解:内城非裔美国父亲对其参与儿科医疗之家的看法。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2018 Jun;5(3):617-622. doi: 10.1007/s40615-017-0407-4. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
2
Introduction--Knowledge translation and urban health equity: advancing the agenda.引言——知识转化与城市健康公平:推进议程。
J Urban Health. 2012 Dec;89(6):875-80. doi: 10.1007/s11524-012-9693-7.
3
Motivational assessment of non-treatment buprenorphine research participation in heroin dependent individuals.激励评估非治疗丁丙诺啡研究参与海洛因依赖个体。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012 Jun 1;123(1-3):173-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.11.005. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
4
Primary prevention of lead exposure: the Philadelphia lead safe homes study.铅暴露的一级预防:费城铅安全家园研究。
Public Health Rep. 2011 May-Jun;126 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):76-88. doi: 10.1177/00333549111260S111.
5
Screening for latent tuberculosis infection among undocumented immigrants in Swiss healthcare centres; a descriptive exploratory study.瑞士医疗中心对无证移民进行潜伏性结核感染筛查;一项描述性探索性研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2009 Mar 24;9:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-9-34.
6
A health behaviour cross-sectional study of immigrants and non-immigrants in a Swiss urban general-practice setting.瑞士城市一般实践环境中移民与非移民的健康行为横断面研究。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2010 Feb;12(1):24-32. doi: 10.1007/s10903-008-9148-0. Epub 2008 Apr 30.
7
Disparities in health information quality across the rural-urban continuum: where is coded data more reliable?城乡连续体中健康信息质量的差异:编码数据在何处更可靠?
J Med Syst. 2008 Feb;32(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s10916-007-9100-1.
8
The childbearing health and related service needs of newcomers (CHARSNN) study protocol.新移民的生育健康及相关服务需求(CHARSNN)研究方案
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2006 Dec 26;6:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-6-31.

本文引用的文献

1
The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research.《贝尔蒙报告》。保护人类研究受试者的伦理原则与准则。
J Am Coll Dent. 2014 Summer;81(3):4-13.
2
Capacity to provide informed consent for participation in schizophrenia and HIV research.为参与精神分裂症和艾滋病病毒研究提供知情同意的能力。
Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Jul;159(7):1201-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.7.1201.
3
Payment of research subjects: a broader perspective.研究对象的报酬:更广阔的视角
Am J Bioeth. 2001 Spring;1(2):66-7. doi: 10.1162/152651601300169185.
4
Money for research participation: does in jeopardize informed consent?参与研究的报酬:这会危及知情同意吗?
Am J Bioeth. 2001 Spring;1(2):40-4. doi: 10.1162/152651601300169031.
5
Case history of the Center for Urban Epidemiologic Studies in New York City.纽约市城市流行病学研究中心的病例记录。
J Urban Health. 2001 Sep;78(3):508-18. doi: 10.1093/jurban/78.3.508.
6
Inner city health.市中心区卫生
CMAJ. 2001 Jan 23;164(2):214-5.
7
Recruiting families of color from the inner city: insights from the recruiters.从市中心招募有色人种家庭:招募者的见解。
Nurs Outlook. 2000 Sep-Oct;48(5):230-7. doi: 10.1067/mno.2000.102992.
8
Agency-based tracking of difficult-to-follow populations: runaway and homeless youth programs in St. Louis, Missouri.基于机构的难以追踪人群的跟踪:密苏里州圣路易斯的离家出走和无家可归青少年项目。
Community Ment Health J. 2000 Jun;36(3):247-58. doi: 10.1023/a:1001905114143.
9
Urban issues in health promotion strategies.健康促进策略中的城市问题。
Am J Public Health. 2000 Jun;90(6):863-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.6.863.
10
What's the price of a research subject? Approaches to payment for research participation.研究对象的价值几何?研究参与的付费方式。
N Engl J Med. 1999 Jul 15;341(3):198-203. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199907153410312.