• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Case history of the Center for Urban Epidemiologic Studies in New York City.纽约市城市流行病学研究中心的病例记录。
J Urban Health. 2001 Sep;78(3):508-18. doi: 10.1093/jurban/78.3.508.
2
Doing community-driven research: a description of Seattle Partners for Healthy Communities.开展社区驱动型研究:西雅图健康社区伙伴组织介绍
J Urban Health. 2001 Sep;78(3):519-34. doi: 10.1093/jurban/78.3.519.
3
Implementing community-based participatory research centers in diverse urban settings.在不同的城市环境中建立基于社区的参与性研究中心。
J Urban Health. 2001 Sep;78(3):488-94. doi: 10.1093/jurban/78.3.488.
4
CDC Urban Research Centers: community-based participatory research to improve the health of urban communities.美国疾病控制与预防中心城市研究中心:基于社区的参与性研究以改善城市社区健康状况
J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2001 Jan-Feb;10(1):9-15. doi: 10.1089/152460901750067070.
5
Can communities and academia work together on public health research? Evaluation results from a community-based participatory research partnership in Detroit.社区和学术界能否在公共卫生研究方面开展合作?来自底特律一个基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系的评估结果。
J Urban Health. 2001 Sep;78(3):495-507. doi: 10.1093/jurban/78.3.495.
6
Challenges and facilitating factors in sustaining community-based participatory research partnerships: lessons learned from the Detroit, New York City and Seattle Urban Research Centers.维持基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系中的挑战与促进因素:来自底特律、纽约市和西雅图城市研究中心的经验教训
J Urban Health. 2006 Nov;83(6):1022-40. doi: 10.1007/s11524-006-9110-1.
7
Collaboration among community members, local health service providers, and researchers in an urban research center in Harlem, New York.纽约哈莱姆区一个城市研究中心的社区成员、当地医疗服务提供者和研究人员之间的合作。
Public Health Rep. 2001 Nov-Dec;116(6):530-9. doi: 10.1093/phr/116.6.530.
8
Addressing urban health in Detroit, New York City, and Seattle through community-based participatory research partnerships.通过基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系解决底特律、纽约市和西雅图的城市健康问题。
Am J Public Health. 2003 May;93(5):803-11. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.5.803.
9
Building partnerships with the community: lessons from the Camden Health Improvement Learning Collaborative.与社区建立伙伴关系:来自卡姆登健康改善学习协作组织的经验教训
J Healthc Manag. 2000 May-Jun;45(3):189-205.
10
Community as client: reaching an underserved urban community and meeting unmet primary health care needs.以社区为服务对象:接触服务不足的城市社区并满足未得到满足的初级卫生保健需求。
J Community Health Nurs. 2007 Fall;24(3):177-90. doi: 10.1080/07370010701429611.

引用本文的文献

1
Using community-based participatory research and organizational diagnosis to characterize relationships between community leaders and academic researchers.运用基于社区的参与性研究和组织诊断来描述社区领袖与学术研究人员之间的关系。
Prev Med Rep. 2017 Jun 21;7:180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.06.007. eCollection 2017 Sep.
2
Faculty perspectives on community-based research: "I see this still as a journey".教师对基于社区的研究的看法:“我仍将此视为一段旅程”。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2009 Jun;4(2):3-16. doi: 10.1525/jer.2009.4.2.3.
3
Structuring an inter-sector research partnership: a negotiated zone.构建跨部门研究伙伴关系:一个协商区域。
Soz Praventivmed. 2006;51(6):335-44. doi: 10.1007/s00038-006-5071-0.
4
Challenges and facilitating factors in sustaining community-based participatory research partnerships: lessons learned from the Detroit, New York City and Seattle Urban Research Centers.维持基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系中的挑战与促进因素:来自底特律、纽约市和西雅图城市研究中心的经验教训
J Urban Health. 2006 Nov;83(6):1022-40. doi: 10.1007/s11524-006-9110-1.
5
Building and sustaining community-institutional partnerships for prevention research: findings from a national collaborative.建立和维持用于预防研究的社区-机构伙伴关系:一项全国性合作的成果
J Urban Health. 2006 Nov;83(6):989-1003. doi: 10.1007/s11524-006-9113-y.
6
Identification of gaps in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood asthma using a community-based participatory research approach.采用基于社区的参与性研究方法识别儿童哮喘诊断和治疗中的差距。
J Urban Health. 2004 Sep;81(3):472-88. doi: 10.1093/jurban/jth131.
7
Strategies for setting a national research agenda that is responsive to community needs.制定响应社区需求的国家研究议程的策略。
Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Dec;111(16):1855-60. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6267.
8
Addressing urban health in Detroit, New York City, and Seattle through community-based participatory research partnerships.通过基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系解决底特律、纽约市和西雅图的城市健康问题。
Am J Public Health. 2003 May;93(5):803-11. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.5.803.
9
Methodological, practical, and ethical challenges to inner-city health research.市中心区健康研究面临的方法学、实践和伦理挑战。
J Urban Health. 2002 Dec;79(4 Suppl 1):S35-42. doi: 10.1093/jurban/79.suppl_1.s35.
10
Implementing community-based participatory research centers in diverse urban settings.在不同的城市环境中建立基于社区的参与性研究中心。
J Urban Health. 2001 Sep;78(3):488-94. doi: 10.1093/jurban/78.3.488.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementing community-based participatory research centers in diverse urban settings.在不同的城市环境中建立基于社区的参与性研究中心。
J Urban Health. 2001 Sep;78(3):488-94. doi: 10.1093/jurban/78.3.488.
2
Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health.基于社区的研究综述:评估改善公众健康的伙伴关系方法。
Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173-202. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173.
3
Excess mortality in Harlem.哈莱姆区的超额死亡率。
N Engl J Med. 1990 Jan 18;322(3):173-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199001183220306.

纽约市城市流行病学研究中心的病例记录。

Case history of the Center for Urban Epidemiologic Studies in New York City.

作者信息

Freudenberg N

机构信息

Urban Public Health, Hunter College, City University of New York, 425 East 25th Street, New York, NY 10010, USA.

出版信息

J Urban Health. 2001 Sep;78(3):508-18. doi: 10.1093/jurban/78.3.508.

DOI:10.1093/jurban/78.3.508
PMID:11564853
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3455914/
Abstract

This case history describes the history of the Center for Urban Epidemiological Studies (CUES), an urban research center based in New York City. Between 1996 and 1999, CUES was transformed from an institution that worked with the medical schools of the region to a center seeking to define a new practice of community-based participatory research (CBPR). The report summarizes how and why CUES has changed, identifies its main accomplishments and challenges, and discusses some of the lessons learned to date. It illustrates how the principles of CBPR have influenced the development of CUES. The case history suggests that it is possible for an organization to transform itself from a researcher-driven orientation toward a more participatory model. The early history also demonstrates that it is possible to engage community organizations and activists in an ongoing effort to study and address complex urban health problems such as asthma, substance abuse, and infectious diseases. Finally, the report illustrates that CBPR is a process that evolves in response to specific situational factors.

摘要

本病例史描述了城市流行病学研究中心(CUES)的历史,这是一个位于纽约市的城市研究中心。1996年至1999年间,CUES从一个与该地区医学院合作的机构转变为一个寻求定义基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)新实践的中心。该报告总结了CUES如何以及为何发生变化,确定了其主要成就和挑战,并讨论了迄今为止吸取的一些经验教训。它说明了CBPR的原则如何影响了CUES的发展。该病例史表明,一个组织有可能从以研究者为主导的方向转变为更具参与性的模式。早期历史还表明,有可能让社区组织和活动家持续参与研究和解决诸如哮喘、药物滥用和传染病等复杂的城市健康问题。最后,该报告表明,CBPR是一个根据特定情境因素不断演变的过程。