Pecora Nikole, Yaman Peter, Dennison Joseph, Herrero Alberto
School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, 1011 N. University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1078, USA.
J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Nov;88(5):511-5. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.129063.
Dentin adhesives are characterized on the basis of their bond strength to dentin; however, great variation exists within the same material depending on the testing apparatus. To realistically compare bond strengths, the testing mechanisms must be the same.
The purpose of this investigation was to use 2 testing devices to evaluate the shear bond strength of 3 single-bottle adhesives with their multistep counterparts.
The occlusal surfaces of 120 freshly extracted third molars were ground to expose the dentin and polished with 600-grit silicon carbide paper. Three single-bottle, (Optibond Solo Plus, 3M Single Bond, and Excite) and 3 multistep adhesives (Optibond FL, 3M MultiPurpose Plus, and Syntac) were each used to bond a composite cylinder (made from a 2.379 +/-.001-mm diameter by 4-mm-high mold) of Tetric Ceram to 20 teeth. The specimens were stored in 100% humidity for 24 hours. The shear bond strength at failure was measured in kilograms and converted to megapascals for each material, using a knife (conventional method) and an Ultradent testing device on a universal testing machine (Instron) at a loading rate of 0.5 mm/min. A 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was performed comparing the 2 testing devices and the materials at P<.05. Where significant, a 1-way ANOVA test was conducted among the materials for each test group, and a Tukey multiple comparison test was used to determine significant differences among the materials tested (P<.05). An independent Student t test at P<.05 was used to determine significance between testing devices.
The results showed that Optibond Solo Plus (26.85 +/- 8.76 MPa), Optibond FL (25.40 +/- 4.44 MPa), 3M Single Bond (28.12 +/- 5.01 MPa), and 3M MultiPurpose Plus (34.40 +/- 7.90 MPa) had significantly higher bond strengths when tested with the Ultradent testing device. The mean values for Excite (19.47 +/- 6.17 MPa) and Syntac (20.20 +/- 7.07 MPa) were also higher with the Ultradent testing device, but the difference was not significant.
Within the limitations of this study, all bonding agents tested resulted in higher mean shear bond strengths when tested with the Ultradent testing device compared with the unrestricted knife. The single-step bonding agents exhibited mean bond strengths comparable to their multistep counterparts.
牙本质粘结剂的特性是基于其与牙本质的粘结强度来确定的;然而,同一材料的粘结强度会因测试仪器的不同而存在很大差异。为了实际比较粘结强度,测试机制必须相同。
本研究的目的是使用两种测试装置来评估3种单瓶粘结剂与其多步骤对应粘结剂的剪切粘结强度。
将120颗新鲜拔除的第三磨牙的咬合面磨平以暴露牙本质,并用600目碳化硅砂纸进行抛光。3种单瓶粘结剂(Optibond Solo Plus、3M Single Bond和Excite)以及3种多步骤粘结剂(Optibond FL、3M MultiPurpose Plus和Syntac)分别用于将由Tetric Ceram制成的复合圆柱体(由直径2.379±0.001毫米、高4毫米的模具制成)粘结到20颗牙齿上。将标本在100%湿度下储存24小时。使用刀具(传统方法)和Ultradent测试装置在万能材料试验机(Instron)上以0.5毫米/分钟的加载速率测量每种材料在破坏时的剪切粘结强度,单位为千克,并换算为兆帕。进行双向方差分析(ANOVA)测试,以比较两种测试装置和材料,P<0.05。若有显著性差异,则对每个测试组的材料进行单向ANOVA测试,并使用Tukey多重比较测试来确定所测试材料之间的显著差异(P<0.05)。使用P<0.05的独立学生t检验来确定测试装置之间的显著性差异。
结果表明,使用Ultradent测试装置测试时,Optibond Solo Plus(26.85±8.76兆帕)、Optibond FL(25.40±4.44兆帕)、3M Single Bond(28.12±5.01兆帕)和3M MultiPurpose Plus(34.40±7.90兆帕)的粘结强度显著更高。使用Ultradent测试装置时,Excite(19.47±6.17兆帕)和Syntac(20.20±7.07兆帕)的平均值也更高,但差异不显著。
在本研究的局限性内,与无限制的刀具相比,使用Ultradent测试装置测试时,所有测试的粘结剂均产生了更高的平均剪切粘结强度。单步粘结剂的平均粘结强度与其多步骤对应粘结剂相当。