Suppr超能文献

一项多中心IV期研究中瑞芬太尼与芬太尼不良反应情况的比较。

A comparison of the remifentanil and fentanyl adverse effect profile in a multicenter phase IV study.

作者信息

Joshi Girish P, Warner David S, Twersky Rebecca S, Fleisher Lee A

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 2002 Nov;14(7):494-9. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(02)00404-x.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the frequency of adverse effects of remifentanil and fentanyl in a large and diverse patient population.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, open-label study.

SETTING

Multicenter study including academic and community hospitals.

PATIENTS

2,438 adult patients (1,496 outpatients and 942 inpatients) scheduled for elective surgical procedures under general endotracheal anesthesia of at least 30-minute duration.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous (IV) remifentanil (n = 1,229) 0.5 microg/kg/min for induction and tracheal intubation followed by an infusion rate of 0.25 microg/kg/min or fentanyl (n = 1,209) administered according to the anesthesiologist's usual practice. Anesthesia was maintained with propofol and/or isoflurane (with or without nitrous oxide) titrated according to protocol. Transition analgesia with either morphine or fentanyl was administered in the remifentanil and, at the anesthesiologist's discretion, in the fentanyl group.

MEASUREMENTS

The overall nonspecific and specific (i.e., opioid-related) adverse effects were recorded.

MAIN RESULTS

Remifentanil was associated with more intraoperative hypotension than fentanyl (p < 0.05). All four cases (0.3%) of muscle rigidity occurred in the remifentanil-treated outpatients. There were no significant differences between the two drugs with respect to other adverse events (i.e., episodes of hypertension, bradycardia, respiratory depression, and apnea).

CONCLUSIONS

In the doses used, both remifentanil and fentanyl have a similar frequency of adverse effects except for the higher frequency of hypotension associated with the use of remifentanil.

摘要

研究目的

比较瑞芬太尼和芬太尼在大量不同患者群体中不良反应的发生率。

设计

前瞻性、随机、开放标签研究。

地点

包括学术医院和社区医院的多中心研究。

患者

2438例成年患者(1496例门诊患者和942例住院患者),计划在全身气管内麻醉下进行至少30分钟的择期外科手术。

干预措施

患者被随机分配接受静脉注射(IV)瑞芬太尼(n = 1229),诱导和气管插管时剂量为0.5微克/千克/分钟,随后输注速率为0.25微克/千克/分钟,或芬太尼(n = 1209),根据麻醉医生的常规做法给药。根据方案滴定丙泊酚和/或异氟烷(有或没有氧化亚氮)维持麻醉。瑞芬太尼组以及根据麻醉医生的判断,芬太尼组使用吗啡或芬太尼进行过渡镇痛。

测量指标

记录总体非特异性和特异性(即阿片类药物相关)不良反应。

主要结果

与芬太尼相比,瑞芬太尼术中低血压发生率更高(p < 0.05)。所有4例(0.3%)肌强直均发生在接受瑞芬太尼治疗的门诊患者中。两种药物在其他不良事件(即高血压、心动过缓、呼吸抑制和呼吸暂停发作)方面无显著差异。

结论

在所用剂量下,除瑞芬太尼使用时低血压发生率较高外,瑞芬太尼和芬太尼的不良反应发生率相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验