Meinertz Thomas, Lip Gregory Y H, Lombardi Fedrico, Sadowski Zigmunt P, Kalsch Brigitte, Camez Anne, Hewkin Ann, Eberle Siegfried
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Klinik für Innere Medizin, Abteilung für Kardiologie, Hamburg, Germany.
Am J Cardiol. 2002 Dec 15;90(12):1300-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02867-9.
We report a double-blind, multicenter, multinational, placebo-controlled, and well-controlled trial to prove that the sustained-release (SR) formulation of propafenone is superior to placebo in preventing symptoms of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). A total of 594 patients were enrolled in the qualifying period of the study and 293 patients were randomized at 53 centers. There were significant increases in the arrhythmia-free periods from day 5 of randomization to the first recurrence of symptomatic atrial arrhythmia in the propafenone SR 325 mg twice daily (p = 0.004) and propafenone SR 425 mg twice daily (p = 0.003) treatment groups compared with placebo. The median arrhythmia-free time was 9 days in the placebo group, 35 days in the propafenone SR 325 mg twice daily group, and 44 days in the propafenone SR 425 mg twice daily group. There was a significant reduction in average heart rate during the first recurrence of symptomatic arrhythmia after day 5 in the low-dose propafenone group compared with placebo. The median treatment failure time from day 5 (arrhythmia recurrence, adverse events, and withdrawals) was prolonged from 8 days in the placebo group to 19 days in the propafenone SR 325 mg twice daily group (p = 0.002) and to 24 days in the propafenone SR 425 mg twice daily group (p = 0.006). The percentage of patients with >/=1 serious adverse event was similar in the propafenone SR treatment groups (propafenone SR 325 mg twice daily, 10.0%; propafenone SR 425 mg twice daily, 11.2%) but lower in the placebo group (1.1%). In conclusion, the SR formulation of propafenone is superior to placebo, well-tolerated, and prevents symptoms of paroxysmal AF.
我们报告了一项双盲、多中心、跨国、安慰剂对照且严格控制的试验,以证明普罗帕酮缓释(SR)制剂在预防阵发性心房颤动(AF)症状方面优于安慰剂。共有594例患者进入研究的合格期,293例患者在53个中心进行随机分组。与安慰剂相比,普罗帕酮SR 325 mg每日两次(p = 0.004)和普罗帕酮SR 425 mg每日两次(p = 0.003)治疗组从随机分组第5天到有症状性房性心律失常首次复发的无心律失常期显著延长。安慰剂组的无心律失常中位时间为9天,普罗帕酮SR 325 mg每日两次组为35天,普罗帕酮SR 425 mg每日两次组为44天。与安慰剂相比,低剂量普罗帕酮组在第5天后有症状性心律失常首次复发期间的平均心率显著降低。从第5天起(心律失常复发、不良事件和退出研究)的中位治疗失败时间从安慰剂组的8天延长至普罗帕酮SR 325 mg每日两次组的19天(p = 0.002)和普罗帕酮SR 425 mg每日两次组的24天(p = 0.006)。普罗帕酮SR治疗组中发生≥1次严重不良事件的患者百分比相似(普罗帕酮SR 325 mg每日两次组为10.0%;普罗帕酮SR 425 mg每日两次组为11.2%),但在安慰剂组中较低(1.1%)。总之,普罗帕酮SR制剂优于安慰剂,耐受性良好,可预防阵发性AF的症状。