Circulation. 1995 Nov 1;92(9):2550-7.
Few antiarrhythmic agents have been shown in randomized controlled trials to be effective and well tolerated in the prophylaxis of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Propafenone, a class IC anti-arrhythmic agent with weak beta-adrenoceptor antagonist properties, has shown promise in preliminary clinical studies.
A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the efficacy and tolerability of propafenone was undertaken in 100 patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia ([PSVT] n = 52) or atrial fibrillation/flutter ([PAF] n = 48) who had recorded two or more symptomatic arrhythmia recurrences by transtelephonic ECG monitoring during a 3-month drug-free observation period. Patients were randomized into two consecutive crossover periods of propafenone (300 mg BID) versus placebo followed by 300 mg TID propafenone versus placebo. Analysis was based on the time to treatment failure, defined as the interval from treatment onset to the occurrence of either ECG-documented arrhythmia or an intolerable adverse event. With a proportional-hazards model, we determined the relative risk (95% confidence interval) of treatment failure after the achievement of steady-state drug levels for placebo compared with propafenone 300 mg BID to be 6.8 (2.2 to 21.2, P < .001, n = 45) for PSVT and 6.0 (1.8 to 20.0, P = .004, n = 30) for PAF. Due to a greater incidence of adverse events on high-dose propafenone, the relative risks of receiving placebo rather than propafenone 300 TID were only 2.2 (0.9 to 5.3, P = .1, n = 34) for PSVT and 1.9 (0.7 to 4.7, P = .2, n = 25) for PAF. However, if adverse events were excluded in the high-dose comparison, relative risks for arrhythmia recurrence were 15.0 (2.0 to 113, P = .009) for PSVT and incalculable (no preferences for placebo, P = .0002) for PAF. One episode of wide-complex tachycardia was documented during propafenone therapy.
Propafenone is of value in the prophylaxis of both PSVT and PAF. A dose of 300 mg BID is effective and well tolerated. A larger dose of 300 mg TID causes more adverse effects but may be more effective in those who can tolerate it.
在随机对照试验中,很少有抗心律失常药物被证明在预防阵发性室上性心动过速或阵发性心房颤动方面有效且耐受性良好。普罗帕酮是一种具有弱β肾上腺素能受体拮抗特性的IC类抗心律失常药物,在初步临床研究中已显示出前景。
对100例阵发性室上性心动过速([PSVT],n = 52)或心房颤动/扑动([PAF],n = 48)患者进行了一项关于普罗帕酮疗效和耐受性的双盲、安慰剂对照试验。这些患者在3个月的无药观察期内通过电话心电图监测记录到两次或更多次有症状的心律失常复发。患者被随机分为两个连续的交叉期,分别接受普罗帕酮(300 mg,每日两次)与安慰剂对比,随后是300 mg,每日三次的普罗帕酮与安慰剂对比。分析基于治疗失败时间,治疗失败定义为从治疗开始到出现心电图记录的心律失常或不可耐受的不良事件的间隔时间。使用比例风险模型,我们确定在达到稳态药物水平后,与300 mg,每日两次的普罗帕酮相比,安慰剂治疗失败的相对风险(95%置信区间)在PSVT患者中为6.8(2.2至21.2,P <.001,n = 45),在PAF患者中为6.0(1.8至20.0,P =.004,n = 30)。由于高剂量普罗帕酮的不良事件发生率更高,对于PSVT患者,接受安慰剂而非300 mg,每日三次普罗帕酮的相对风险仅为2.2(0.9至5.3,P =.1,n = 34),对于PAF患者为1.9(0.7至4.7,P =.2,n = 25)。然而,如果在高剂量比较中排除不良事件,PSVT患者心律失常复发的相对风险为15.0(2.0至113,P =.009),PAF患者则无法计算(对安慰剂无偏好,P =.0002)。在普罗帕酮治疗期间记录到1次宽QRS波心动过速发作。
普罗帕酮在预防PSVT和PAF方面均有价值。300 mg,每日两次的剂量有效且耐受性良好。300 mg,每日三次的较大剂量会引起更多不良反应,但对于能够耐受的患者可能更有效。