Suppr超能文献

心力衰竭的死亡方式:来自ATLAS试验的结果

Mode of death in heart failure: findings from the ATLAS trial.

作者信息

Poole-Wilson P A, Uretsky B F, Thygesen K, Cleland J G F, Massie B M, Rydén L

机构信息

Faculty of Medicial Imperial College, London, UK.

出版信息

Heart. 2003 Jan;89(1):42-8. doi: 10.1136/heart.89.1.42.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate markers that predict modes of death in patients with chronic heart failure.

DESIGN

Randomised, double blind, three period, comparative, parallel group study (ATLAS, assessment of treatment with lisinopril and survival).

PATIENTS

3164 patients with mild, moderate, or severe chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association functional class II-IV).

INTERVENTIONS

High dose (32.5 or 35 mg) or low dose (2.5 or 5 mg) lisinopril once daily for a median of 46 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

All cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, sudden death, and chronic heart failure death related to prognostic factors using competing risks analysis. Mode of death was classified by trialists and by an independent end point committee.

RESULTS

Age, male sex, pre-existing ischaemic heart disease, increasing heart rate, creatinine concentration, and certain drugs taken at randomisation were markers of increased risk of all cause mortality and cardiovascular death. There were risk markers for sudden death that were different from the risk markers for death from chronic heart failure. Low systolic blood pressure at baseline, raised creatinine, reduced serum sodium or haemoglobin, and increased heart rate were associated with chronic heart failure death. Use of beta blockers or antiarrhythmic agents (mainly amiodarone) was associated with a reduced risk of sudden death, whereas long acting nitrates and previous use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors were markers for increased risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of competing risks analysis on the data from the ATLAS study has identified variables associated with certain modes of death in heart failure patients. This approach to analysing outcomes may make it possible to predict which patients might benefit most from particular therapeutic interventions.

摘要

目的

研究预测慢性心力衰竭患者死亡方式的标志物。

设计

随机、双盲、三阶段、比较性、平行组研究(ATLAS,赖诺普利治疗与生存评估)。

患者

3164例轻、中、重度慢性心力衰竭患者(纽约心脏协会心功能分级II-IV级)。

干预措施

高剂量(32.5或35毫克)或低剂量(2.5或5毫克)赖诺普利每日一次,中位治疗时间为46个月。

主要观察指标

采用竞争风险分析,评估全因死亡率、心血管死亡率、猝死以及与预后因素相关的慢性心力衰竭死亡情况。死亡方式由试验人员和独立终点委员会进行分类。

结果

年龄、男性、既往存在的缺血性心脏病、心率增加、肌酐浓度以及随机分组时服用的某些药物是全因死亡率和心血管死亡风险增加的标志物。猝死的风险标志物与慢性心力衰竭死亡的风险标志物不同。基线收缩压较低、肌酐升高、血清钠或血红蛋白降低以及心率增加与慢性心力衰竭死亡相关。使用β受体阻滞剂或抗心律失常药物(主要是胺碘酮)与猝死风险降低相关,而长效硝酸盐类药物以及既往使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂是风险增加的标志物。

结论

对ATLAS研究数据采用竞争风险分析,已确定与心力衰竭患者特定死亡方式相关的变量。这种分析结果的方法可能使预测哪些患者可能从特定治疗干预中获益最大成为可能。

相似文献

1
Mode of death in heart failure: findings from the ATLAS trial.
Heart. 2003 Jan;89(1):42-8. doi: 10.1136/heart.89.1.42.
5
Clinical characteristics and long-term prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction in China.
Heart Lung Circ. 2014 Sep;23(9):818-26. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2014.02.022. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
10
Association of blood pressure and its evolving changes with the survival of patients with heart failure.
J Card Fail. 2008 Sep;14(7):561-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2008.03.006. Epub 2008 May 27.

引用本文的文献

2
Dementia and in-hospital mortality: retrospective analysis of a nationwide administrative database of elderly subjects in Italy.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2022 May;34(5):1037-1045. doi: 10.1007/s40520-021-02021-8. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
3
Ventricular Arrhythmias in Seniors with Heart Failure: Present Dilemmas and Therapeutic Considerations: A Systematic Review.
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2022;18(2):e181021197279. doi: 10.2174/1573403X17666211018095324.
4
What is Quality End-of-Life Care for Patients With Heart Failure? A Qualitative Study With Physicians.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Sep 15;9(18):e016505. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016505. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
5
Pharmacological interventions for heart failure in people with chronic kidney disease.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 27;2(2):CD012466. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012466.pub2.
6
Impact of Obesity on Ventricular Assist Device Outcomes.
J Card Fail. 2020 Apr;26(4):287-297. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.10.001. Epub 2019 Oct 13.
8
Devices in heart failure; diagnosis, detection and disease modification.
Br Med Bull. 2018 Mar 1;125(1):91-102. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldx051.
9
Prognostic Importance of Temporal Changes in Resting Heart Rate in Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: From the TOPCAT Study.
JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Nov;5(11):782-791. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.08.018. Epub 2017 Oct 11.

本文引用的文献

2
Clinical trials update: IMPROVEMENT-HF, COPERNICUS, MUSTIC, ASPECT-II, APRICOT and HEART.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2000 Dec;2(4):455-60. doi: 10.1016/s1388-9842(00)00127-6.
5
Sudden death in heart failure: vascular or electrical?
Eur J Heart Fail. 1999 Mar;1(1):41-5. doi: 10.1016/S1388-9842(99)00009-4.
6
Is the prognosis of heart failure improving?
Eur J Heart Fail. 1999 Aug;1(3):229-41. doi: 10.1016/s1388-9842(99)00032-x.
8
The aspirin-angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor tradeoff: to halve and halve not.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Jun;35(7):1808-12. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00637-9.
10
Survival of patients with a new diagnosis of heart failure: a population based study.
Heart. 2000 May;83(5):505-10. doi: 10.1136/heart.83.5.505.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验