• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂赖诺普利低剂量和高剂量对慢性心力衰竭发病率和死亡率的比较影响。ATLAS研究组

Comparative effects of low and high doses of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril, on morbidity and mortality in chronic heart failure. ATLAS Study Group.

作者信息

Packer M, Poole-Wilson P A, Armstrong P W, Cleland J G, Horowitz J D, Massie B M, Rydén L, Thygesen K, Uretsky B F

机构信息

College of Physicians and Surgeons (M.P.), Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

Circulation. 1999 Dec 7;100(23):2312-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.23.2312.

DOI:10.1161/01.cir.100.23.2312
PMID:10587334
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are generally prescribed by physicians in doses lower than the large doses that have been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure. It is unclear, however, if low doses and high doses of ACE inhibitors have similar benefits.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We randomly assigned 3164 patients with New York Heart Association class II to IV heart failure and an ejection fraction < or = 30% to double-blind treatment with either low doses (2.5 to 5.0 mg daily, n=1596) or high doses (32.5 to 35 mg daily, n=1568) of the ACE inhibitor, lisinopril, for 39 to 58 months, while background therapy for heart failure was continued. When compared with the low-dose group, patients in the high-dose group had a nonsignificant 8% lower risk of death (P=0.128) but a significant 12% lower risk of death or hospitalization for any reason (P=0.002) and 24% fewer hospitalizations for heart failure (P=0.002). Dizziness and renal insufficiency was observed more frequently in the high-dose group, but the 2 groups were similar in the number of patients requiring discontinuation of the study medication. Conclusions-These findings indicate that patients with heart failure should not generally be maintained on very low doses of an ACE inhibitor (unless these are the only doses that can be tolerated) and suggest that the difference in efficacy between intermediate and high doses of an ACE inhibitor (if any) is likely to be very small.

摘要

背景

医生通常给患者开具的血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂剂量低于已证实可降低心力衰竭患者发病率和死亡率的大剂量。然而,低剂量和高剂量的ACE抑制剂是否具有相似的益处尚不清楚。

方法与结果

我们将3164例纽约心脏协会心功能II级至IV级、射血分数≤30%的心力衰竭患者随机分为两组,分别接受低剂量(每日2.5至5.0毫克,n = 1596)或高剂量(每日32.5至35毫克,n = 1568)的ACE抑制剂赖诺普利进行双盲治疗,为期39至58个月,同时继续进行心力衰竭的背景治疗。与低剂量组相比,高剂量组患者的死亡风险降低8%,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.128),但因任何原因导致的死亡或住院风险显著降低12%(P = 0.002),心力衰竭住院次数减少24%(P = 0.002)。高剂量组更频繁地观察到头晕和肾功能不全,但两组中需要停用研究药物的患者数量相似。结论——这些发现表明,心力衰竭患者一般不应长期使用非常低剂量的ACE抑制剂(除非这些是唯一能耐受的剂量),并提示ACE抑制剂中剂量和高剂量之间的疗效差异(如果有的话)可能非常小。

相似文献

1
Comparative effects of low and high doses of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril, on morbidity and mortality in chronic heart failure. ATLAS Study Group.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂赖诺普利低剂量和高剂量对慢性心力衰竭发病率和死亡率的比较影响。ATLAS研究组
Circulation. 1999 Dec 7;100(23):2312-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.23.2312.
2
[Clinical study of the month. The ATLAS study].
Rev Med Liege. 1999 Dec;54(12):952-4.
3
Toleration of high doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with chronic heart failure: results from the ATLAS trial. The Assessment of Treatment with Lisinopril and Survival.慢性心力衰竭患者对高剂量血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的耐受性:ATLAS试验结果。赖诺普利治疗与生存评估。
Arch Intern Med. 2001 Jan 22;161(2):165-71. doi: 10.1001/archinte.161.2.165.
4
Do evidence-based treatments provide incremental benefits to patients with congestive heart failure already receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors? A secondary analysis of one-year outcomes from the Assessment of Treatment with Lisinopril and Survival (ATLAS) study.循证治疗能否为已经接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗的充血性心力衰竭患者带来额外益处?赖诺普利治疗与生存评估(ATLAS)研究一年期结果的二次分析。
Clin Ther. 2004 May;26(5):694-703. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90069-0.
5
Results of the ATLAS study. High or low doses of ACE inhibitors for heart failure?
Cleve Clin J Med. 1998 Nov-Dec;65(10):539-42. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.65.10.539.
6
Comparison of vasopeptidase inhibitor, omapatrilat, and lisinopril on exercise tolerance and morbidity in patients with heart failure: IMPRESS randomised trial.血管肽酶抑制剂奥美帕替利与赖诺普利对心力衰竭患者运动耐量和发病率影响的比较:IMPRESS随机试验
Lancet. 2000 Aug 19;356(9230):615-20. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02602-7.
7
Low doses vs. high doses of the angiotensin converting-enzyme inhibitor lisinopril in chronic heart failure: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on the Assessment of Treatment with Lisinopril and Survival (ATLAS) study. The ATLAS Study Group.低剂量与高剂量血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂赖诺普利治疗慢性心力衰竭的成本效益分析:基于赖诺普利治疗与生存评估(ATLAS)研究。ATLAS研究小组
Eur J Heart Fail. 2000 Dec;2(4):447-54. doi: 10.1016/s1388-9842(00)00122-7.
8
High- versus low-dose angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in the treatment of heart failure: an economic analysis of the Assessment of Treatment with Lisinopril and Survival (ATLAS) trial.高剂量与低剂量血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗心力衰竭:赖诺普利治疗与生存评估(ATLAS)试验的经济学分析
Am J Manag Care. 2003 Jun;9(6):417-24.
9
High dose lisinopril in heart failure: economic considerations.心力衰竭中高剂量赖诺普利:经济考量
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2002 Jul;16(4):365-71. doi: 10.1023/a:1021794229020.
10
Lisinopril: a review of its use in congestive heart failure.赖诺普利:其在充血性心力衰竭中应用的综述
Drugs. 2000 May;59(5):1149-67. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200059050-00012.

引用本文的文献

1
Breaking new ground in heart failure management: novel therapies and future frontiers.心力衰竭管理领域的新突破:新型疗法与未来前沿。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Aug 20;12:1643971. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1643971. eCollection 2025.
2
Hyperkalemia in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Implications and Management.射血分数降低的心力衰竭中的高钾血症:影响与管理
Heart Fail Rev. 2025 Aug 22. doi: 10.1007/s10741-025-10549-4.
3
Prognostic Implications of Left-Ventricular Function Changes in Young Acute Heart Failure Patients.
年轻急性心力衰竭患者左心室功能变化的预后意义
Int J Heart Fail. 2025 Jul 22;7(3):162-172. doi: 10.36628/ijhf.2025.0024. eCollection 2025 Jul.
4
Guideline-directed medical strategies for the co-management of heart failure and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.心力衰竭与代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝病联合管理的指南导向性医学策略。
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 Jul 28;5(1):312. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-00951-2.
5
The state of the art in medical therapies for pediatric heart failure.小儿心力衰竭的医学治疗现状。
JHLT Open. 2025 May 29;9:100292. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100292. eCollection 2025 Aug.
6
Is It Safe to Initiate/Optimize the Medication of HFrEF Patients During Hospitalization for Acute Decompensation?对于急性失代偿期住院的射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者,启动/优化药物治疗是否安全?
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 13;14(8):2664. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082664.
7
Newly diagnosed heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: timing, sequencing, and titration of guideline-recommended medical therapy.新诊断的射血分数降低的心力衰竭:指南推荐的药物治疗的时机、顺序和滴定
Eur Heart J. 2025 Jul 1;46(25):2394-2405. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf244.
8
A comprehensive review on diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM): histological spectrum, diagnosis, pathogenesis, and management with conventional treatments and natural compounds.糖尿病性心肌病(DCM)的全面综述:组织学谱、诊断、发病机制以及传统治疗和天然化合物的管理
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025 Mar 18. doi: 10.1007/s00210-025-03980-9.
9
Clinical outcomes according to the average daily dose of sacubitril/valsartan: a nationwide longitudinal cohort study.根据沙库巴曲缬沙坦平均日剂量的临床结局:一项全国性纵向队列研究。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Mar 18. doi: 10.1007/s00392-025-02602-x.
10
Aldosterone and Potassium in Heart Failure: Overcoming This Major Impediment in Clinical Practice.心力衰竭中的醛固酮与钾:克服临床实践中的这一主要障碍
Card Fail Rev. 2024 Dec 20;10:e18. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2024.09. eCollection 2024.